Detection of Election Fraud

Susumu Shikano, Verena Mack
{"title":"Detection of Election Fraud","authors":"Susumu Shikano, Verena Mack","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190469771.013.45","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While election fraud is mostly detected and reported by real political actors like election observers, academic research can contribute through systematic analysis of previous information in determining when fraud has occurred and estimating how many votes were affected. This chapter presents social science research, based on the idea that election fraud is conceived as an intervention in random processes that generate fraud-free “normal votes.” The authors discuss two points: first, which fraudulent acts exist and how they intervene in fraud-free election processes; second, which assumptions enable random fraud-free election processes. They distinguish among several approaches in existing research: those that set up a fraud-free random process in a theory-guided way, which requires some predictors of normal votes; natural- or field-experimental approaches that exploit existing random processes; and models that capture the random process in a single election result.","PeriodicalId":146256,"journal":{"name":"The Oxford Handbook of Public Choice, Volume 2","volume":"305 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Oxford Handbook of Public Choice, Volume 2","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190469771.013.45","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While election fraud is mostly detected and reported by real political actors like election observers, academic research can contribute through systematic analysis of previous information in determining when fraud has occurred and estimating how many votes were affected. This chapter presents social science research, based on the idea that election fraud is conceived as an intervention in random processes that generate fraud-free “normal votes.” The authors discuss two points: first, which fraudulent acts exist and how they intervene in fraud-free election processes; second, which assumptions enable random fraud-free election processes. They distinguish among several approaches in existing research: those that set up a fraud-free random process in a theory-guided way, which requires some predictors of normal votes; natural- or field-experimental approaches that exploit existing random processes; and models that capture the random process in a single election result.
选举舞弊的侦查
虽然选举舞弊大多是由选举观察员等真正的政治行为者发现和报告的,但学术研究可以通过系统分析以前的信息来确定舞弊何时发生,并估计有多少选票受到影响。本章介绍了社会科学研究,其基础是选举舞弊被认为是对随机过程的干预,从而产生无舞弊的“正常投票”。作者讨论了两点:第一,存在哪些欺诈行为以及它们如何干预无欺诈的选举过程;其次,哪些假设能够实现随机的无欺诈选举过程。他们对现有研究中的几种方法进行了区分:一种是以理论指导的方式建立无欺诈的随机过程,这需要对正常投票进行一些预测;利用现有随机过程的自然或现场实验方法;以及在单一选举结果中捕捉随机过程的模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信