Water Discharge Measurement by ADCP During Freeze-up Period

S. V. Buzmakov, A. V. Iukhno, A. A. Zorina
{"title":"Water Discharge Measurement by ADCP During Freeze-up Period","authors":"S. V. Buzmakov, A. V. Iukhno, A. A. Zorina","doi":"10.26516/2073-3402.2022.39.28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As a part of the modernization of the national hydrological network, a large number of ADCPs were delivered to the stream-gaging stations of the Roshydromet and, as a rule, used only during the open channel period. At the same time, the measurement of water discharge during the freeze-up period has always been a laborious, technically complex task, and using ADCPs during this period can optimize the measurement procedure. The article presents the issues of the features of ADCPs using on the national hydrological network of Roshydromet, the existing instrument and methodological base for measuring water discharge under the ice cover with ADCP. Either, the results of comparative field measurements of water discharge and velocities on the Ob, Neva and Oredezh rivers were considered. These rivers cover a wide range of hydrodynamic conditions: the Ob is a typical large river, with an average flow velocity is about 0.30 m/s, and a maximum depth about 20 m; the Neva is a unique large river, with a high average flow velocity value is about 0.8 m/s and a maximum depth not exceeding 11 m; the Oredezh river is a typical small river with mean flow velocity about 0.2 m/s and depths of not more than 1.5 m. In the experiments, ADCP Teledyne RiverRay and SonTek M9 were used, and comparative measurements were performed by the mechanical current meter and electromagnetic flow velocity device “Poseidon-1”. On the basis of these experiments first conclusions were drawn about the features of the ADCP application during the freeze-up period. Thus, the authors found that it is most effective to use ADCPs on medium and large rivers - labor and time costs are significantly lower than using conventional methods for measuring water flow, and the measurement accuracy is comparable. At the same time, the article notes a number of significant weak points, most of which boil down to the thesis that the measurement of water discharges using ADCP under ice involves the use of a large number of technically complex and expensive equipment, and the failure of at least one element leads to the inability to complete the measurement. Special attention is paid to the main technical aspects of working with devices, as well as with specialized software. Therefore, it is always recommended to have a spare standard measuring instrument in extra. The main technical aspects of working with devices as well as with specialized software are also discussed in more detail in the body of the article.","PeriodicalId":147615,"journal":{"name":"The Bulletin of Irkutsk State University. Series Earth Sciences","volume":"103 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Bulletin of Irkutsk State University. Series Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26516/2073-3402.2022.39.28","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As a part of the modernization of the national hydrological network, a large number of ADCPs were delivered to the stream-gaging stations of the Roshydromet and, as a rule, used only during the open channel period. At the same time, the measurement of water discharge during the freeze-up period has always been a laborious, technically complex task, and using ADCPs during this period can optimize the measurement procedure. The article presents the issues of the features of ADCPs using on the national hydrological network of Roshydromet, the existing instrument and methodological base for measuring water discharge under the ice cover with ADCP. Either, the results of comparative field measurements of water discharge and velocities on the Ob, Neva and Oredezh rivers were considered. These rivers cover a wide range of hydrodynamic conditions: the Ob is a typical large river, with an average flow velocity is about 0.30 m/s, and a maximum depth about 20 m; the Neva is a unique large river, with a high average flow velocity value is about 0.8 m/s and a maximum depth not exceeding 11 m; the Oredezh river is a typical small river with mean flow velocity about 0.2 m/s and depths of not more than 1.5 m. In the experiments, ADCP Teledyne RiverRay and SonTek M9 were used, and comparative measurements were performed by the mechanical current meter and electromagnetic flow velocity device “Poseidon-1”. On the basis of these experiments first conclusions were drawn about the features of the ADCP application during the freeze-up period. Thus, the authors found that it is most effective to use ADCPs on medium and large rivers - labor and time costs are significantly lower than using conventional methods for measuring water flow, and the measurement accuracy is comparable. At the same time, the article notes a number of significant weak points, most of which boil down to the thesis that the measurement of water discharges using ADCP under ice involves the use of a large number of technically complex and expensive equipment, and the failure of at least one element leads to the inability to complete the measurement. Special attention is paid to the main technical aspects of working with devices, as well as with specialized software. Therefore, it is always recommended to have a spare standard measuring instrument in extra. The main technical aspects of working with devices as well as with specialized software are also discussed in more detail in the body of the article.
冻结期ADCP水量测量
作为国家水文网现代化的一部分,大量adcp被交付给水文气象的流量测量站,通常只在明渠期间使用。同时,冻结期水量的测量一直是一项费力且技术复杂的任务,在此期间使用adcp可以优化测量程序。本文介绍了ADCP在国家水文网络中应用的特点、ADCP测量冰下水量的现有仪器和方法基础等问题。此外,还考虑了Ob河、Neva河和Oredezh河的流量和流速的比较实地测量结果。这些河流涵盖了广泛的水动力条件:鄂毕河是典型的大河,平均流速约为0.30 m/s,最大水深约为20 m;涅瓦河是一条独特的大河,平均流速约为0.8 m/s,最大水深不超过11 m;奥列杰日河为典型的小河,平均流速约为0.2 m/s,水深不超过1.5 m。实验采用ADCP Teledyne RiverRay和SonTek M9,采用机械流速仪和电磁流速仪“Poseidon-1”进行对比测量。在此基础上,初步得出了ADCP在冻结期应用的特点。因此,作者发现在中大型河流上使用ADCPs是最有效的-人工和时间成本明显低于使用传统方法测量水流,并且测量精度相当。与此同时,文章也指出了一些重要的弱点,其中大部分都归结为这样一个论点,即使用ADCP在冰下测量水排放量涉及使用大量技术复杂且昂贵的设备,并且至少有一个元件的故障导致无法完成测量。特别注意与设备工作的主要技术方面,以及与专门的软件。因此,总是建议额外准备一个备用的标准测量仪器。在本文的正文中还详细讨论了使用设备和专用软件的主要技术方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信