The Management of large and massive rotator cuff tears- Current trends amongst UK shoulder surgeons

Hackney Rg, Cowling Paul, I. M, Javed M, Conaghan Pg, Kingsbury Sr
{"title":"The Management of large and massive rotator cuff tears- Current trends amongst UK shoulder surgeons","authors":"Hackney Rg, Cowling Paul, I. M, Javed M, Conaghan Pg, Kingsbury Sr","doi":"10.17352/pjor.000014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Management of large and massive rotator cuff tears remains controversial. Such tears are often irreparable, and results of treatment are unpredictable. This study documents the current practice of orthopaedic surgeons in the British Elbow and Shoulder Society. Methods: A questionnaire was prepared pertaining to the management of large and massive rotator cuff tears with minimal degenerative changes in three age groups: Patients of 50 years (young), 65 years (still active), aged 75 years (elderly) were considered. Various risk factors for failure of repair were considered. Results: Physiotherapy and arthroscopic debridement were the most commonly selected management options in young and middle groups in cases of a large/massive rotator cuff tear. Patch repairs were offered by 30% of respondents overall. Latissimus dorsi transfer was utilised by 30%, 8% and 2% respectively in each age group. Reverse shoulder replacement was indicated by 8%, 36% and 76% respectively. Discussion: There was a marked inconsistency in the pre-op planning and number and choice of options between respondents. Most surgeons offered non-augmented repairs in a scenario where they admitted failure was likely. The need for a multicenter trial is widely recognised and 87% of respondents were willing to participate in such a trial.","PeriodicalId":245794,"journal":{"name":"Open Journal of Orthopedics and Rheumatology","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Journal of Orthopedics and Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17352/pjor.000014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Management of large and massive rotator cuff tears remains controversial. Such tears are often irreparable, and results of treatment are unpredictable. This study documents the current practice of orthopaedic surgeons in the British Elbow and Shoulder Society. Methods: A questionnaire was prepared pertaining to the management of large and massive rotator cuff tears with minimal degenerative changes in three age groups: Patients of 50 years (young), 65 years (still active), aged 75 years (elderly) were considered. Various risk factors for failure of repair were considered. Results: Physiotherapy and arthroscopic debridement were the most commonly selected management options in young and middle groups in cases of a large/massive rotator cuff tear. Patch repairs were offered by 30% of respondents overall. Latissimus dorsi transfer was utilised by 30%, 8% and 2% respectively in each age group. Reverse shoulder replacement was indicated by 8%, 36% and 76% respectively. Discussion: There was a marked inconsistency in the pre-op planning and number and choice of options between respondents. Most surgeons offered non-augmented repairs in a scenario where they admitted failure was likely. The need for a multicenter trial is widely recognised and 87% of respondents were willing to participate in such a trial.
大而大规模肩袖撕裂的处理-英国肩部外科医生的当前趋势
背景:大且大量肩袖撕裂的处理仍然存在争议。这样的眼泪往往是无法弥补的,治疗的结果是不可预测的。本研究记录了目前英国肘部和肩部协会骨科医生的实践。方法:准备了一份调查问卷,涉及三个年龄组的大而巨大的肩袖撕裂的处理,伴有最小的退行性改变:50岁(年轻),65岁(仍然活跃),75岁(老年人)。考虑了导致修复失败的各种风险因素。结果:物理治疗和关节镜下清创是中青年组大/大面积肩袖撕裂患者最常选择的治疗方案。总体而言,30%的受访者提供补丁修复服务。各年龄组背阔肌移植率分别为30%、8%和2%。分别有8%、36%和76%的患者建议进行反向肩关节置换术。讨论:在术前计划和应答者的数量和选择上存在明显的不一致。大多数外科医生在他们承认可能失败的情况下提供非增强修复。开展多中心试验的必要性已得到广泛认可,87%的应答者愿意参加这样的试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书