{"title":"Planning a temporary city of ondemand communities","authors":"M. Ferreri","doi":"10.5117/9789462984912_CH05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The chapter explores how temporary urban ideas and values have become\n embedded in urban planning policy. It examines the institutionalisation\n of pop-up and temporary places in post-2008 London policymaking. It particularly\n draws on policy analysis, participant observations and interviews\n with public agencies, professionals and community organisations involved\n in the redevelopment of the London 2012 Olympics neighbourhoods.\n The case of a youth-oriented temporary community space is taken as\n emblematic of a shift towards increasingly short-term public provision at\n the margins of longer-term privatisation. It concludes that the imaginary of\n pop-up participation follows an ‘on-demand’ logic that sits uncomfortably\n with the needs and demands of urban communities affected by austerity\n policies and that risks ushering in further exclusion and precarisation.","PeriodicalId":371064,"journal":{"name":"The Permanence of Temporary Urbanism","volume":"115 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Permanence of Temporary Urbanism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5117/9789462984912_CH05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The chapter explores how temporary urban ideas and values have become
embedded in urban planning policy. It examines the institutionalisation
of pop-up and temporary places in post-2008 London policymaking. It particularly
draws on policy analysis, participant observations and interviews
with public agencies, professionals and community organisations involved
in the redevelopment of the London 2012 Olympics neighbourhoods.
The case of a youth-oriented temporary community space is taken as
emblematic of a shift towards increasingly short-term public provision at
the margins of longer-term privatisation. It concludes that the imaginary of
pop-up participation follows an ‘on-demand’ logic that sits uncomfortably
with the needs and demands of urban communities affected by austerity
policies and that risks ushering in further exclusion and precarisation.