A Bilateral Monopoly Model of Profit Sharing along Vertical Production Structure

J. Shen, P. Scaramozzino
{"title":"A Bilateral Monopoly Model of Profit Sharing along Vertical Production Structure","authors":"J. Shen, P. Scaramozzino","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3239757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates the firm-level division of the gains in the vertical production structure and provides a new theoretical framework to explain how gains are divided among firms and within the vertical supply chain. It constructs an economic model using a bilateral monopoly market structure to analyse how the average profitability varies with the stages in the chain. By introducing a vertical restraint known as quantity fixing, the double marginalization problem arising as a result of bilateral monopoly can be resolved. It demonstrates joint-profit maximizing contracts emerge under quantity fixing parameters whereby the Assembly and downstream retailer eliminate the incentives for vertical integration. This paper also shows the downstream retailer is more profitable than the upstream Manufacturer if (and only if) both the capability and cost effect of Retailer dominates the two counterpart effects of Manufacturer. For the dominance of capability effect, the retailer must have higher monoposonistic market power in the intermediate inputs market than in the final goods market where it acts as a monopolist. As a result, it could extract more surplus from manufacturer rather than consumers. In terms of cost effect, the factor endowment structure differentials are important to the model. The labour intensive nature of the Manufacturer would lead it to the lower average product of labour, generating a lower level of profitability compared with downstream Retailer which is more capital intensive with higher average labour productivity.","PeriodicalId":301337,"journal":{"name":"Social Responsibility in Production & Supply Chain Management eJournal","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Responsibility in Production & Supply Chain Management eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3239757","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper investigates the firm-level division of the gains in the vertical production structure and provides a new theoretical framework to explain how gains are divided among firms and within the vertical supply chain. It constructs an economic model using a bilateral monopoly market structure to analyse how the average profitability varies with the stages in the chain. By introducing a vertical restraint known as quantity fixing, the double marginalization problem arising as a result of bilateral monopoly can be resolved. It demonstrates joint-profit maximizing contracts emerge under quantity fixing parameters whereby the Assembly and downstream retailer eliminate the incentives for vertical integration. This paper also shows the downstream retailer is more profitable than the upstream Manufacturer if (and only if) both the capability and cost effect of Retailer dominates the two counterpart effects of Manufacturer. For the dominance of capability effect, the retailer must have higher monoposonistic market power in the intermediate inputs market than in the final goods market where it acts as a monopolist. As a result, it could extract more surplus from manufacturer rather than consumers. In terms of cost effect, the factor endowment structure differentials are important to the model. The labour intensive nature of the Manufacturer would lead it to the lower average product of labour, generating a lower level of profitability compared with downstream Retailer which is more capital intensive with higher average labour productivity.
纵向生产结构下利润分享的双边垄断模型
本文研究了垂直生产结构中企业层面的收益分配,并提供了一个新的理论框架来解释收益如何在企业之间和垂直供应链内分配。构建了一个双边垄断市场结构的经济模型,分析了平均盈利能力随供应链各阶段的变化规律。通过引入一种称为数量固定的纵向限制,可以解决由于双边垄断而产生的双重边缘化问题。在数量固定参数下,装配厂和下游零售商消除了垂直整合的激励,从而产生了联合利润最大化合同。本文还表明,当(且仅当)零售商的能力效应和成本效应均优于制造商的两种对应效应时,下游零售商比上游制造商更有利可图。为了实现能力支配效应,零售商在中间投入品市场上的垄断市场力必须高于其在最终产品市场上的垄断市场力。因此,它可以从制造商而不是消费者那里榨取更多的剩余。在成本效应方面,要素禀赋结构差异对模型有重要影响。与下游零售商相比,制造商的劳动密集型性质会导致其劳动的平均产品较低,产生较低的盈利水平,下游零售商的资本密集程度更高,平均劳动生产率更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书