Position-Residue Specific Dynamic Gap Penalty Scoring Strategy for Multiple Sequence Alignment

Sanjay S. Bankapur, Nagamma Patil
{"title":"Position-Residue Specific Dynamic Gap Penalty Scoring Strategy for Multiple Sequence Alignment","authors":"Sanjay S. Bankapur, Nagamma Patil","doi":"10.1145/3156346.3156354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Multiple Sequence Alignment (MSA) is a basic tool for biological sequence analysis and also a crucial step utilized by biologists to analyze phylogentic, gene regulations, homology marker, drug discovery, and predicting the protein structure and its functions. Effective Alignment of multiple sequences having biologic relevance is still an open problem. Accuracy of MSA is highly dependent on the scoring function, which aligns a given residue to its appropriate position during alignment. Scoring function has three possible cases to score a pair of residues: i) a residue with same residue, ii) a residue with different residue and iii) a residue with gap. A number of biological meaningful approaches are developed for the first two cases. However, for the third case, most of the approaches follow the default score for gap penalty, which is provided as an input by an expert. In this study, we propose a new, biologically relevant, and position-residue specific dynamic scoring approach for gap penalty. Position-Residue Specific Dynamic Gap Penalty (PRSDGP) scoring function is tested on the BAliBASE benchmark dataset. The proposed PRSDGP scoring approach is compared with the CLUSTAL O program and Quality metric improvement ranges from 46.2% to 81.5%.","PeriodicalId":415207,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Computational Systems-Biology and Bioinformatics","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Computational Systems-Biology and Bioinformatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3156346.3156354","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Multiple Sequence Alignment (MSA) is a basic tool for biological sequence analysis and also a crucial step utilized by biologists to analyze phylogentic, gene regulations, homology marker, drug discovery, and predicting the protein structure and its functions. Effective Alignment of multiple sequences having biologic relevance is still an open problem. Accuracy of MSA is highly dependent on the scoring function, which aligns a given residue to its appropriate position during alignment. Scoring function has three possible cases to score a pair of residues: i) a residue with same residue, ii) a residue with different residue and iii) a residue with gap. A number of biological meaningful approaches are developed for the first two cases. However, for the third case, most of the approaches follow the default score for gap penalty, which is provided as an input by an expert. In this study, we propose a new, biologically relevant, and position-residue specific dynamic scoring approach for gap penalty. Position-Residue Specific Dynamic Gap Penalty (PRSDGP) scoring function is tested on the BAliBASE benchmark dataset. The proposed PRSDGP scoring approach is compared with the CLUSTAL O program and Quality metric improvement ranges from 46.2% to 81.5%.
基于位置残基的多序列比对动态间隙惩罚计分策略
多序列比对(Multiple Sequence Alignment, MSA)是生物序列分析的基本工具,也是生物学家分析系统发育、基因调控、同源标记、药物发现以及预测蛋白质结构和功能的重要手段。具有生物学相关性的多序列的有效比对仍然是一个悬而未决的问题。MSA的精度高度依赖于评分函数,该函数在对齐过程中将给定的残基对齐到适当的位置。评分函数对一对残差评分有三种可能的情况:1)残差相同的残差,2)残差不同的残差,3)残差有间隙。针对前两种情况,开发了许多具有生物学意义的方法。然而,对于第三种情况,大多数方法都遵循间隙惩罚的默认分数,这是由专家提供的输入。在这项研究中,我们提出了一种新的、生物学相关的、位置残基特定的间隙惩罚动态评分方法。在BAliBASE基准数据集上测试了位置残差特定动态间隙惩罚(PRSDGP)评分函数。将提出的PRSDGP评分方法与CLUSTAL O方案和质量度量改进范围从46.2%到81.5%进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信