119 Polypharmacy and acuity among emergency department short stay unit patients

Jack Xu, T. Schmidt
{"title":"119 Polypharmacy and acuity among emergency department short stay unit patients","authors":"Jack Xu, T. Schmidt","doi":"10.1136/bmjebm-2018-111070.119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Emergency department (ED)-based short-stay units (SSUs) have been implemented globally with the primary scope of accommodating non-emergent, self-care sufficient adult patients who need either diagnostic tests, observation, or short-term treatment. Recently there has been a trend towards admitting patients with more complex disease to SSUs. Mainly because of increasingly overcrowded internal medicine departments. Objectives To investigate and evaluate the current patient clientele at a SSU, with an emphasis on polypharmacy. Methods We conducted a single center SSU point-prevalence study. Data collection included patients’ gender, age, Danish Emergency Process Triage (DEPT) acuity ranking upon admission (in order of decreasing severity: red, orange, yellow, green), primary diagnosis, number of active medications and types of medications. Results Out of 15 patients there were 10 men, mean age 70.3 (±SEM 4.16), and 5 women mean age 68.2 (±SEM 5.86), p=0.775. DEPT acuity ranking among men: 50% yellow, 50% green; among women: 20% orange, 60% yellow, 20% green. The most common diagnoses upon admission were pneumonia (33%), exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (27%), and the need of blood transfusion due to malignancy-induced anemia (20%). 87% of patients had ³ 5 active medications, of these 60% were on paracetamol, 40% were on anti-hypertensives, 27% received antidepressants, 20% were on anti-coagulants. Conclusion Currently other than non-emergent patients are SSU admitted, and polypharmacy is highly prevalent among them. The appropriateness of this development is questionable. A short stay focus may be inappropriate for sorting out polypharmacy in patients with increasingly complex disease.","PeriodicalId":298595,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Evidenced-Based Medicine","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Evidenced-Based Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjebm-2018-111070.119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Emergency department (ED)-based short-stay units (SSUs) have been implemented globally with the primary scope of accommodating non-emergent, self-care sufficient adult patients who need either diagnostic tests, observation, or short-term treatment. Recently there has been a trend towards admitting patients with more complex disease to SSUs. Mainly because of increasingly overcrowded internal medicine departments. Objectives To investigate and evaluate the current patient clientele at a SSU, with an emphasis on polypharmacy. Methods We conducted a single center SSU point-prevalence study. Data collection included patients’ gender, age, Danish Emergency Process Triage (DEPT) acuity ranking upon admission (in order of decreasing severity: red, orange, yellow, green), primary diagnosis, number of active medications and types of medications. Results Out of 15 patients there were 10 men, mean age 70.3 (±SEM 4.16), and 5 women mean age 68.2 (±SEM 5.86), p=0.775. DEPT acuity ranking among men: 50% yellow, 50% green; among women: 20% orange, 60% yellow, 20% green. The most common diagnoses upon admission were pneumonia (33%), exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (27%), and the need of blood transfusion due to malignancy-induced anemia (20%). 87% of patients had ³ 5 active medications, of these 60% were on paracetamol, 40% were on anti-hypertensives, 27% received antidepressants, 20% were on anti-coagulants. Conclusion Currently other than non-emergent patients are SSU admitted, and polypharmacy is highly prevalent among them. The appropriateness of this development is questionable. A short stay focus may be inappropriate for sorting out polypharmacy in patients with increasingly complex disease.
119急诊科短期住院病人的综合用药与视力
以急诊科(ED)为基础的短期住院单元(SSUs)已在全球范围内实施,主要用于容纳需要诊断测试、观察或短期治疗的非紧急、自我护理充分的成年患者。最近,有一种趋势是接纳患有更复杂疾病的患者到特殊护理病房。主要是因为内科人满为患。目的调查和评估SSU目前的患者客户,重点是综合用药。方法进行单中心SSU点患病率研究。收集的数据包括患者的性别、年龄、入院时丹麦急诊分诊(DEPT)的视力等级(按严重程度递减顺序:红色、橙色、黄色、绿色)、初步诊断、有效药物数量和药物类型。结果15例患者中,男性10例,平均年龄70.3(±SEM 4.16);女性5例,平均年龄68.2(±SEM 5.86), p=0.775。男性DEPT敏锐度排名:50%黄,50%绿;女性:20%为橙色,60%为黄色,20%为绿色。入院时最常见的诊断是肺炎(33%)、慢性阻塞性肺疾病加重(27%)和因恶性贫血需要输血(20%)。87%的患者有5种有效药物,其中扑热息痛占60%,降压药占40%,抗抑郁药占27%,抗凝血药占20%。结论目前非急诊住院患者多为SSU患者,且多药现象较为普遍。这种发展的适当性值得怀疑。短期停留焦点可能不适合对日益复杂的疾病患者进行多药分类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信