{"title":"Comparison of two-way ranging with FMCW and UWB radar systems","authors":"A. Figueroa, B. Al-Qudsi, N. Joram, F. Ellinger","doi":"10.1109/WPNC.2016.7822856","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this work, two positioning systems based on the two-way ranging synchronization-protocol, are discussed and compared. A frequency modulated continuous wave (FMCW), and a ultra wide band (UWB) radio detection and ranging (Radar) setup are used for this comparison. Indoor and outdoor ranging measurements between one host and one tag node were performed and evaluated. These radar systems present an alternative to global positioning system (GPS) tracking, especially for indoor use, where GPS does not work reliably or at all. This is due to the requirement of GPS of a perfect line Of sight (LOS) connection between satellites and the object to be tracked. The FMCW system was superior in raw measurement quality with accuracy below 25 cm, as well as measured maximum range with 70 m (FMCW) against 30 m (UWB). Worst-case precision was measured to be 2.3 cm (FMCW) against 2.8 cm (UWB). The UWB system allows for very high update rates of 400 Hz with low computational effort.","PeriodicalId":148664,"journal":{"name":"2016 13th Workshop on Positioning, Navigation and Communications (WPNC)","volume":"255 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 13th Workshop on Positioning, Navigation and Communications (WPNC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WPNC.2016.7822856","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9
Abstract
In this work, two positioning systems based on the two-way ranging synchronization-protocol, are discussed and compared. A frequency modulated continuous wave (FMCW), and a ultra wide band (UWB) radio detection and ranging (Radar) setup are used for this comparison. Indoor and outdoor ranging measurements between one host and one tag node were performed and evaluated. These radar systems present an alternative to global positioning system (GPS) tracking, especially for indoor use, where GPS does not work reliably or at all. This is due to the requirement of GPS of a perfect line Of sight (LOS) connection between satellites and the object to be tracked. The FMCW system was superior in raw measurement quality with accuracy below 25 cm, as well as measured maximum range with 70 m (FMCW) against 30 m (UWB). Worst-case precision was measured to be 2.3 cm (FMCW) against 2.8 cm (UWB). The UWB system allows for very high update rates of 400 Hz with low computational effort.
本文对两种基于双向测距同步协议的定位系统进行了讨论和比较。频率调制连续波(FMCW)和超宽带(UWB)无线电探测和测距(雷达)设置用于此比较。在一个主机和一个标签节点之间进行室内和室外测距测量并进行评估。这些雷达系统提供了全球定位系统(GPS)跟踪的替代方案,特别是用于室内使用,GPS不可靠或根本无法工作。这是由于GPS要求卫星和被跟踪对象之间有一个完美的视线(LOS)连接。FMCW系统在原始测量质量方面具有优势,精度低于25 cm,最大测量范围为70 m (FMCW)和30 m (UWB)。最坏精度测量为2.3 cm (FMCW)对2.8 cm (UWB)。UWB系统允许400 Hz的非常高的更新速率,并且计算量很低。