Germany's Academic Policy Advisory System in Response to COVID-19

Jae-Hoon Lee
{"title":"Germany's Academic Policy Advisory System in Response to COVID-19","authors":"Jae-Hoon Lee","doi":"10.21592/eucj.2023.41.69","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Corona Pandemic served as an opportunity to highlight the need for academic policy advice. In the case of Germany, it can be said that it has operated various types of academic policy advisory bodies in relation to socially important issues before the Corona Pandemic; various advisory committees for social and political issues have been frequently operated without being prescribed by Act, e.g. Ethics Committee for the Self-Driving Vehicle, the Data Ethics Committee, and the Competition Act 4.0 Committee for competition policy advice, etc. In line with this administrative and practical trend, Germany's federal government has established and operated an academic policy advisory committee called the Federal Corona Pandemic Expert Committee in relation to the COVID-19. Meanwhile, the German federal government has established and operated the Robert-Koch -Research Institute, which can be called a federal-level specialized institution, for the purpose of accumulating health-related expertise that can respond professionally to various diseases. Although the RKI has the status of a federal administrative agency, it is an administrative agency in charge of information collection, academic promotion, and data disclosure and evaluation related to various diseases. In addition, to enhance expertise in the field, RKI separately organizes and operates 18 expert advisory committees, and operates a standing vaccination committee and an expert advisory committee on epidemic respiratory infections in connection with the COVID-19 pandemic. This paper aims to analyze the governance structure related to German academic policy advice and the legal effect of academic policy advice, and through this process, it aims to derive domestic implications for academic policy advice.","PeriodicalId":232789,"journal":{"name":"European Constitutional Law Association","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Constitutional Law Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21592/eucj.2023.41.69","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Corona Pandemic served as an opportunity to highlight the need for academic policy advice. In the case of Germany, it can be said that it has operated various types of academic policy advisory bodies in relation to socially important issues before the Corona Pandemic; various advisory committees for social and political issues have been frequently operated without being prescribed by Act, e.g. Ethics Committee for the Self-Driving Vehicle, the Data Ethics Committee, and the Competition Act 4.0 Committee for competition policy advice, etc. In line with this administrative and practical trend, Germany's federal government has established and operated an academic policy advisory committee called the Federal Corona Pandemic Expert Committee in relation to the COVID-19. Meanwhile, the German federal government has established and operated the Robert-Koch -Research Institute, which can be called a federal-level specialized institution, for the purpose of accumulating health-related expertise that can respond professionally to various diseases. Although the RKI has the status of a federal administrative agency, it is an administrative agency in charge of information collection, academic promotion, and data disclosure and evaluation related to various diseases. In addition, to enhance expertise in the field, RKI separately organizes and operates 18 expert advisory committees, and operates a standing vaccination committee and an expert advisory committee on epidemic respiratory infections in connection with the COVID-19 pandemic. This paper aims to analyze the governance structure related to German academic policy advice and the legal effect of academic policy advice, and through this process, it aims to derive domestic implications for academic policy advice.
德国应对新冠肺炎的学术政策咨询体系
冠状病毒大流行为强调学术政策咨询的必要性提供了机会。就德国而言,可以说,它在冠状病毒大流行之前就与社会重要问题有关的各种类型的学术政策咨询机构开展了工作;各种社会和政治问题咨询委员会在没有法律规定的情况下频繁运作,如自动驾驶汽车伦理委员会、数据伦理委员会、竞争政策咨询委员会等。根据这一行政和实践趋势,德国联邦政府成立并运作了与新冠肺炎相关的学术政策咨询委员会“联邦冠状病毒大流行专家委员会”。与此同时,德国联邦政府建立并运营了罗伯特-科赫研究所,这是一个联邦级的专门机构,旨在积累与健康相关的专业知识,以专业的方式应对各种疾病。虽然RKI具有联邦行政机构的地位,但它是负责收集信息、学术推广、与各种疾病有关的数据公开和评估的行政机构。此外,为了加强该领域的专业知识,RKI单独组织和运作了18个专家咨询委员会,并运作了一个常设疫苗接种委员会和一个与COVID-19大流行有关的流行性呼吸道感染专家咨询委员会。本文旨在分析德国学术政策咨询相关的治理结构和学术政策咨询的法律效果,并通过这一过程得出学术政策咨询在国内的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信