Attitudes toward Reproductive Tourism and Cross border reproductive care (CBRC): Legal, Economic, Ethical issues and dilemmas, possibilities and limitations

S. Anastasiadou, Andreas Masouras, Christos Papademetriou
{"title":"Attitudes toward Reproductive Tourism and Cross border reproductive care (CBRC): Legal, Economic, Ethical issues and dilemmas, possibilities and limitations","authors":"S. Anastasiadou, Andreas Masouras, Christos Papademetriou","doi":"10.34190/ictr.6.1.1189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The goal of the present study is to discuss the issue of Cross-Border Reproductive Care known as CBRC and Reproductive Tourism. The subject is of great interest as this type of tourism has been flourishing in recent years, without, however, being thoroughly researched, regarding the very important, health, quality of medical care, financial, ethics, legality and transparency or illegality, aspects concerning the processes that are carried out for the desired result of human reproduction. In addition, one of the sharpest-increasing types of Cross-Border Reproductive Care is international surrogacy.  Thousands of interested people travel abroad for IVF and ICSI treatment, or with the aim to employ the paid services of foreign surrogates. The search for solutions has made CBRC a global industry. It is a multibillion-euro international industry introducing unique legal, financial, ethical, and risk-management challenges and disputes. \nThe current study addressed this gap by examining Greek citizens’ attitudes toward Reproductive Tourism and Cross border reproductive and their legal, financial, ethical, consequences. To test the research hypotheses, a survey was conducted on 652 Greek citizens, who answered a questionnaire, which was distributed electronically in the format of a Google form. For the data analysis the study used the multiple correspondence analysis – MCA of sphere of multivariate data analysis. \nThe results discuss, as far as the legal dimensions are concerned, the restriction on specific reproductive treatments in the country of residence. IVF and ICSI are allowed in almost all countries but there are legal restrictions regarding the age of the woman or the couple, unmarried couples, single woman, gay, transgender and same-sex couples. As far as the financial dimension of the CBRC is concerned, the study discusses the lack of financial data that is a natural consequence of the lack of both national and global registers. The cost of infertility treatment seems to be one of the most basic reasons for those interested to seek assisted reproductive services outside the borders of their country of origin and residence, and the commercialization of health is an ethical issue that deserves further study in relation to the country of destination. In addition, the study discusses main ethical issues regarding donors and surrogate mothers, among others, which have to do with their exploitation, their moral and physical harm, possible child abuse, parental rights and the sale of babies which are considered of a major importance. Donor or surrogate mothers may suffer from serious and even life-threatening complications. Donor or surrogate mothers from low and economic backgrounds do not have the possibility of legal support and coverage and cannot claim parental rights. Additionally, the study debates the high cost of treatments, health and care benefits, the economic exploitation of women from countries with weak economies, the instrumentalization of women, the legal issues and rights of descendants born in destination countries and in terms of their repatriation, the correct information and informed consent for the medical procedures to be performed, as well as many others because the list is long. \nAccording to the study the need that is obvious, due to the great impact of the CBRC, concerns the creation of a universal protocol through the European Council and the College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (EBCOG) as well as the American College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (ACOG) to remove all the above mentioned issues , issues and moral dilemmas that above all will guarantee the good of health, justice, non-harm, the good of justice, autonomy and self-determination and finally, human rights.","PeriodicalId":413105,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Tourism Research","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Tourism Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34190/ictr.6.1.1189","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The goal of the present study is to discuss the issue of Cross-Border Reproductive Care known as CBRC and Reproductive Tourism. The subject is of great interest as this type of tourism has been flourishing in recent years, without, however, being thoroughly researched, regarding the very important, health, quality of medical care, financial, ethics, legality and transparency or illegality, aspects concerning the processes that are carried out for the desired result of human reproduction. In addition, one of the sharpest-increasing types of Cross-Border Reproductive Care is international surrogacy.  Thousands of interested people travel abroad for IVF and ICSI treatment, or with the aim to employ the paid services of foreign surrogates. The search for solutions has made CBRC a global industry. It is a multibillion-euro international industry introducing unique legal, financial, ethical, and risk-management challenges and disputes. The current study addressed this gap by examining Greek citizens’ attitudes toward Reproductive Tourism and Cross border reproductive and their legal, financial, ethical, consequences. To test the research hypotheses, a survey was conducted on 652 Greek citizens, who answered a questionnaire, which was distributed electronically in the format of a Google form. For the data analysis the study used the multiple correspondence analysis – MCA of sphere of multivariate data analysis. The results discuss, as far as the legal dimensions are concerned, the restriction on specific reproductive treatments in the country of residence. IVF and ICSI are allowed in almost all countries but there are legal restrictions regarding the age of the woman or the couple, unmarried couples, single woman, gay, transgender and same-sex couples. As far as the financial dimension of the CBRC is concerned, the study discusses the lack of financial data that is a natural consequence of the lack of both national and global registers. The cost of infertility treatment seems to be one of the most basic reasons for those interested to seek assisted reproductive services outside the borders of their country of origin and residence, and the commercialization of health is an ethical issue that deserves further study in relation to the country of destination. In addition, the study discusses main ethical issues regarding donors and surrogate mothers, among others, which have to do with their exploitation, their moral and physical harm, possible child abuse, parental rights and the sale of babies which are considered of a major importance. Donor or surrogate mothers may suffer from serious and even life-threatening complications. Donor or surrogate mothers from low and economic backgrounds do not have the possibility of legal support and coverage and cannot claim parental rights. Additionally, the study debates the high cost of treatments, health and care benefits, the economic exploitation of women from countries with weak economies, the instrumentalization of women, the legal issues and rights of descendants born in destination countries and in terms of their repatriation, the correct information and informed consent for the medical procedures to be performed, as well as many others because the list is long. According to the study the need that is obvious, due to the great impact of the CBRC, concerns the creation of a universal protocol through the European Council and the College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (EBCOG) as well as the American College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (ACOG) to remove all the above mentioned issues , issues and moral dilemmas that above all will guarantee the good of health, justice, non-harm, the good of justice, autonomy and self-determination and finally, human rights.
对生殖旅游和跨境生殖保健的态度:法律、经济、伦理问题及其困境、可能性和局限性
本研究的目的是讨论跨境生殖保健和生殖旅游的问题。这一主题引起极大兴趣,因为近年来这类旅游蓬勃发展,但在非常重要的健康、医疗保健质量、财务、道德、合法性和透明度或非法性方面没有进行彻底研究,这些方面涉及为实现人类生殖的预期结果而进行的过程。此外,增长最快的跨境生殖保健类型之一是国际代孕。成千上万感兴趣的人出国接受试管婴儿和ICSI治疗,或者是为了雇佣外国代孕者的付费服务。寻求解决方案使银监会成为一个全球性行业。这是一个数十亿欧元的国际行业,带来了独特的法律、金融、道德和风险管理挑战和争议。目前的研究通过调查希腊公民对生殖旅游和跨境生殖的态度及其法律、财务、道德后果来解决这一差距。为了验证研究假设,对652名希腊公民进行了一项调查,他们回答了一份问卷,问卷以谷歌表格的形式以电子方式分发。数据分析采用多元数据分析领域的多重对应分析——MCA。就法律层面而言,结果讨论了居住国对特定生殖治疗的限制。试管婴儿和ICSI几乎在所有国家都是允许的,但对女性或夫妇、未婚夫妇、单身女性、同性恋、变性人和同性伴侣的年龄有法律限制。就中国银监会的财务层面而言,该研究讨论了缺乏财务数据的问题,这是缺乏国家和全球登记册的自然后果。不孕不育治疗的费用似乎是那些有兴趣在其原籍国和居住国境外寻求辅助生殖服务的最基本原因之一,保健商业化是一个值得在目的地国进一步研究的伦理问题。此外,该研究还讨论了关于捐助者和代孕母亲的主要伦理问题,其中涉及对她们的剥削、对她们的精神和身体伤害、可能的虐待儿童、父母权利和被认为非常重要的婴儿买卖。捐赠者或代孕母亲可能会遭受严重甚至危及生命的并发症。来自低收入和经济背景的捐赠者或代孕母亲不可能获得法律支持和保险,也不能主张父母的权利。此外,该研究还讨论了治疗费用高、保健和护理福利、对经济薄弱国家妇女的经济剥削、将妇女作为工具、在目的国出生的后代的法律问题和权利以及在遣返方面的权利、对将要实施的医疗程序的正确信息和知情同意,以及其他许多问题,因为清单很长。根据研究的需要是显而易见的,由于银监会的巨大影响,涉及创建一个通用的协议通过欧盟委员会和学院妇产科(EBCOG)以及美国妇产科学院(妇产科)删除所有上面提到的问题,问题和道德困境,最重要的是保证良好的健康,正义,non-harm,正义的好,自主和自决最后,人权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信