S148 Should nucleic acid amplification tests be routine for sputum smear-positive pulmonary tb patients in london?

O. McManus, C. Anderson, A. Story, O. Kon
{"title":"S148 Should nucleic acid amplification tests be routine for sputum smear-positive pulmonary tb patients in london?","authors":"O. McManus, C. Anderson, A. Story, O. Kon","doi":"10.1136/thorax-2018-212555.154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Of the 2 000 people diagnosed with tuberculosis (TB) annually in London, 1%–2% present with multidrug-resistant (MDR) disease. Nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) on respiratory specimens can detect MDR more quickly than culture, but are used variably across London clinics. We aim to profile London MDR-TB patients to see how many had well-established risk factors for MDR to determine the use of targeted testing with NAATs. Information from routine surveillance of TB patients treated in London 2011–2016 (the London TB Register) was analysed. The prevalence of four known risk factors for MDR-TB (previous history of TB, social risk factors (homelessness, drug or alcohol misuse or imprisonment), contact with a known MDR case, risk of MDR in country of birth) were described among patients with pulmonary MDR-TB, by sputum smear status. Between 2011–2016, 8114 patients were notified with pulmonary TB, of whom 2916 were sputum smear-positive. Seventy-nine patients with pulmonary MDR-TB had data available for all four risk factors. Among the 45 sputum smear-positive MDR-TB patients, 53% had at least one MDR risk factor (29% had a social risk factor, 27% born in a high-MDR burden country, 21% previous TB diagnosis, and 9% contact of another MDR patient). 27% had more than one risk factor. Among the 34 sputum smear-negative MDR-TB patients, 44% had at least one risk factor (19% had a social risk factor, 21% born in a high-MDR burden country, 19% previous TB diagnosis, and 15% contact of another MDR patient). Almost half of patients in London with pulmonary sputum smear-positive MDR-TB had no obvious risk factor for MDR, so were likely to be assessed as low risk by clinicians. Performing NAATs on all pulmonary patients would identify these earlier, ensuring patients are appropriately isolated and not treated with ineffective regimens. While there is a need for a more nuanced approach to better define MDR risk, performing NAATs on all sputum smear-positive patients (450 per year) may be an approach for London clinics to consider.","PeriodicalId":225705,"journal":{"name":"Optimising TB management","volume":"136 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Optimising TB management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/thorax-2018-212555.154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Of the 2 000 people diagnosed with tuberculosis (TB) annually in London, 1%–2% present with multidrug-resistant (MDR) disease. Nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) on respiratory specimens can detect MDR more quickly than culture, but are used variably across London clinics. We aim to profile London MDR-TB patients to see how many had well-established risk factors for MDR to determine the use of targeted testing with NAATs. Information from routine surveillance of TB patients treated in London 2011–2016 (the London TB Register) was analysed. The prevalence of four known risk factors for MDR-TB (previous history of TB, social risk factors (homelessness, drug or alcohol misuse or imprisonment), contact with a known MDR case, risk of MDR in country of birth) were described among patients with pulmonary MDR-TB, by sputum smear status. Between 2011–2016, 8114 patients were notified with pulmonary TB, of whom 2916 were sputum smear-positive. Seventy-nine patients with pulmonary MDR-TB had data available for all four risk factors. Among the 45 sputum smear-positive MDR-TB patients, 53% had at least one MDR risk factor (29% had a social risk factor, 27% born in a high-MDR burden country, 21% previous TB diagnosis, and 9% contact of another MDR patient). 27% had more than one risk factor. Among the 34 sputum smear-negative MDR-TB patients, 44% had at least one risk factor (19% had a social risk factor, 21% born in a high-MDR burden country, 19% previous TB diagnosis, and 15% contact of another MDR patient). Almost half of patients in London with pulmonary sputum smear-positive MDR-TB had no obvious risk factor for MDR, so were likely to be assessed as low risk by clinicians. Performing NAATs on all pulmonary patients would identify these earlier, ensuring patients are appropriately isolated and not treated with ineffective regimens. While there is a need for a more nuanced approach to better define MDR risk, performing NAATs on all sputum smear-positive patients (450 per year) may be an approach for London clinics to consider.
在伦敦,痰涂阳肺结核患者是否应常规进行核酸扩增试验?
在伦敦每年被诊断患有结核病的2000人中,1%-2%患有耐多药(MDR)疾病。对呼吸道标本进行核酸扩增试验(NAATs)可以比培养更快地检测出耐多药耐药,但在伦敦各诊所的使用情况各不相同。我们的目标是对伦敦耐多药结核病患者进行分析,看看有多少人具有确定的耐多药风险因素,以确定使用NAATs进行靶向检测的方法。分析了2011-2016年伦敦治疗结核病患者的常规监测信息(伦敦结核病登记册)。通过痰涂片状况描述了肺部耐多药结核病患者中四种已知耐多药结核病危险因素(结核病既往史、社会危险因素(无家可归、滥用药物或酒精或监禁)、与已知耐多药病例接触、出生国耐多药风险)的流行情况。2011-2016年期间,共有8114例肺结核患者报告,其中2916例痰涂片阳性。79名肺部耐多药结核病患者拥有所有四种危险因素的数据。在45名痰涂片阳性耐多药结核病患者中,53%至少具有一种耐多药风险因素(29%具有社会风险因素,27%出生在耐多药高负担国家,21%既往结核病诊断,9%接触过另一名耐多药患者)。27%的人有一个以上的危险因素。在34名痰涂片阴性的耐多药结核病患者中,44%至少有一种危险因素(19%有社会危险因素,21%出生在耐多药高负担国家,19%以前有结核病诊断,15%曾接触过另一名耐多药患者)。伦敦几乎一半的肺痰涂片阳性耐多药结核病患者没有明显的耐多药危险因素,因此可能被临床医生评估为低风险。对所有肺部患者进行NAATs可以更早地识别这些疾病,确保患者得到适当的隔离,并且不会采用无效的治疗方案。虽然需要一种更细致的方法来更好地定义耐多药风险,但对所有痰涂片阳性患者(每年450例)进行NAATs可能是伦敦诊所考虑的一种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信