RISKS IN THE VISUAL ENVIRONMENT SUCH AS GLARE, ILLUMINANCE AND LUMINANCE RATIO - RISK ASSESSMENTS MADE WITH VISUAL ERGONOMICS RISK ASSESSMENT METHOD, VERAM– A DESCRIPTIVE PAPER

H. Hemphälä, S. Glimne, Marina Heiden, J. Lindén, P. Lindberg, P. Nylén
{"title":"RISKS IN THE VISUAL ENVIRONMENT SUCH AS GLARE, ILLUMINANCE AND LUMINANCE RATIO - RISK ASSESSMENTS MADE WITH VISUAL ERGONOMICS RISK ASSESSMENT METHOD, VERAM– A DESCRIPTIVE PAPER","authors":"H. Hemphälä, S. Glimne, Marina Heiden, J. Lindén, P. Lindberg, P. Nylén","doi":"10.25039/x48.2021.op62","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The visual environment has an impact on subjective strain and headaches. A visual ergonomics risk assessment method, VERAM, was used on 217 workplaces, and consists of both of a subjective questionnaire and an objective risk assessment, the latter risks are presented in this paper. The risk for daylight was assessed to be yellow (moderate risk) or red (high risk) at 53% of the workplaces and the risk for glare was yellow or red at 66%. The assessment of the lighting design showed a yellow or red risk at 44% of the workplaces and the illuminance was assessed to be insufficient at 49% of the workplaces. Flicker or TLM (temporal light modulation) was assessed to be a problem among 33%. These results show that the design of the visual environment is in most cases not performed in a satisfying way. The visual environment is essential to increase wellbeing, health and performance.","PeriodicalId":363368,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Conference CIE 2021","volume":"133 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Conference CIE 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25039/x48.2021.op62","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The visual environment has an impact on subjective strain and headaches. A visual ergonomics risk assessment method, VERAM, was used on 217 workplaces, and consists of both of a subjective questionnaire and an objective risk assessment, the latter risks are presented in this paper. The risk for daylight was assessed to be yellow (moderate risk) or red (high risk) at 53% of the workplaces and the risk for glare was yellow or red at 66%. The assessment of the lighting design showed a yellow or red risk at 44% of the workplaces and the illuminance was assessed to be insufficient at 49% of the workplaces. Flicker or TLM (temporal light modulation) was assessed to be a problem among 33%. These results show that the design of the visual environment is in most cases not performed in a satisfying way. The visual environment is essential to increase wellbeing, health and performance.
视觉环境中的风险,如眩光、照度和亮度比。用视觉工效学风险评估方法veram进行风险评估。一篇描述性论文
视觉环境对主观疲劳和头痛有影响。采用视觉工效学风险评估方法VERAM对217个工作场所进行了研究,该方法由主观问卷调查和客观风险评估两部分组成。53%的工作场所的日光风险被评估为黄色(中度风险)或红色(高风险),66%的工作场所的眩光风险被评估为黄色或红色。对照明设计的评估显示,44%的工作场所存在黄色或红色的风险,49%的工作场所被评估为照明不足。闪烁或TLM(时间光调制)被评估为33%的问题。这些结果表明,在大多数情况下,视觉环境的设计并没有以令人满意的方式进行。视觉环境对提高幸福感、健康和表现至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信