Dystopian Impulses, Feminist Negativity, and the Fascism of the Baby’s Face

Alexis Lothian
{"title":"Dystopian Impulses, Feminist Negativity, and the Fascism of the Baby’s Face","authors":"Alexis Lothian","doi":"10.18574/NYU/9781479811748.003.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Building on the insights of the previous chapter, the second chapter of part 1 turns to feminist dystopian fiction written by antifascist British women between the First and Second World Wars. Man’s World (1926) by Charlotte Haldane and Swastika Night (1937) by Katharine Burdekin use divergent strategies to route modernity’s futures through reproductive bodies, troubling oppositions twenty-first-century critical theory tends to naturalize: between heteronormativity and its others, queer and straight time, futurity and negativity, deviant and normative pleasures. Both novels revolve around the production of futurelessness—not just an undesirable world for some, but the notion that the future could end altogether. This negative speculation resonates with the queer project of articulating a politics that might not rely on reproduction: a futureless politics. At the same time, both Haldane and Burdekin insist that same-sex desire can all too easily appear as one of the various interlocking forces that set in place politically horrifying futures. This convergence of reproductive oppression with homoerotic nationalism calls forth concerns and conflicts in queer studies over the ways in which nonheterosexual bodies, communities, and politics have participated in the perpetuation of racial and colonial violence.","PeriodicalId":245484,"journal":{"name":"Old Futures","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Old Futures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18574/NYU/9781479811748.003.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Building on the insights of the previous chapter, the second chapter of part 1 turns to feminist dystopian fiction written by antifascist British women between the First and Second World Wars. Man’s World (1926) by Charlotte Haldane and Swastika Night (1937) by Katharine Burdekin use divergent strategies to route modernity’s futures through reproductive bodies, troubling oppositions twenty-first-century critical theory tends to naturalize: between heteronormativity and its others, queer and straight time, futurity and negativity, deviant and normative pleasures. Both novels revolve around the production of futurelessness—not just an undesirable world for some, but the notion that the future could end altogether. This negative speculation resonates with the queer project of articulating a politics that might not rely on reproduction: a futureless politics. At the same time, both Haldane and Burdekin insist that same-sex desire can all too easily appear as one of the various interlocking forces that set in place politically horrifying futures. This convergence of reproductive oppression with homoerotic nationalism calls forth concerns and conflicts in queer studies over the ways in which nonheterosexual bodies, communities, and politics have participated in the perpetuation of racial and colonial violence.
反乌托邦的冲动,女权主义的消极,以及婴儿脸上的法西斯主义
在前一章的基础上,第一部分的第二章转向女权主义反乌托邦小说,这些小说由反法西斯的英国女性在第一次和第二次世界大战期间创作。夏洛特·霍尔丹(Charlotte Haldane)的《男人的世界》(1926)和凯瑟琳·伯德金(katherine Burdekin)的《万字之夜》(1937)使用了不同的策略,通过生殖身体,二十一世纪批判理论倾向于自然化的令人不安的对立,来引导现代性的未来:在异性恋和其他异性恋之间,在酷儿和异性恋时间之间,在未来和消极之间,在越界和规范的快乐之间。这两部小说都围绕着“无未来”的产生展开——对一些人来说,这不仅仅是一个不受欢迎的世界,而是未来可能完全终结的概念。这种消极的猜测与酷儿项目产生了共鸣,该项目阐明了一种可能不依赖于再生产的政治:一种没有未来的政治。与此同时,霍尔丹和伯德金都坚持认为,同性欲望很容易成为各种连锁力量之一,导致政治上可怕的未来。生殖压迫与同性恋民族主义的融合,在酷儿研究中引发了对非异性恋身体、社区和政治参与种族和殖民暴力的方式的关注和冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信