Achievements and Prospects for Vascular Surgery in Treatment of Vertebrobasilar Insufficiency

Artur V. Kondaraki, A. V. Chupin, B. Alekyan, V. A. Kul’bak
{"title":"Achievements and Prospects for Vascular Surgery in Treatment of Vertebrobasilar Insufficiency","authors":"Artur V. Kondaraki, A. V. Chupin, B. Alekyan, V. A. Kul’bak","doi":"10.17816/pavlovj109601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Vertebrobasilar insufficiency (VBI) remains an important problem in the modern medicine since approximately every fourth cerebral infarction occurs in the posterior circulation of the brain. These strokes are accompanied by severe consequences and a high risk of repeated events. The article presents the current concepts for surgical treatment of lesions of the subclavian (ScA) and vertebral (VA) arteries responsible for the development of VBI. In the open surgical treatment of symptomatic lesion of the ScA, primarily of occlusion one, extrathoracic interventions prevail in the form of carotid-subclavian bypass and carotid-subclavian transposition. According to our analysis, the results of carotid-subclavian transposition prove to be more preferable. In the endovascular intervention on the ScA, balloon angioplasty is used with possible stenting. In the analysis, we found no differences in the long-term patency between angioplasty and stenting, although the extent of technical success was higher in the group of stenting. In case of stenosis of the ScA, the world medicine gives priority to endovascular methods. To date, there are no sharply defined criteria permitting to choose between the open and endovascular interventions for treatment of the ScA occlusion, although a probable technical failure of endovascular revascularization and higher long-term patency give priority to open surgery. As for symptomatic stenosis of VA, to date there is no evidence of the advantage of stenting over conservative therapy. Thus, surgical intervention should rather be used in case the drug treatment is ineffective. The same can be said about the open reconstruction of the VA, except for the cases of contraindications for stenting of the VA, for example, its tortuosity.","PeriodicalId":113364,"journal":{"name":"I.P. Pavlov Russian Medical Biological Herald","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"I.P. Pavlov Russian Medical Biological Herald","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17816/pavlovj109601","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Vertebrobasilar insufficiency (VBI) remains an important problem in the modern medicine since approximately every fourth cerebral infarction occurs in the posterior circulation of the brain. These strokes are accompanied by severe consequences and a high risk of repeated events. The article presents the current concepts for surgical treatment of lesions of the subclavian (ScA) and vertebral (VA) arteries responsible for the development of VBI. In the open surgical treatment of symptomatic lesion of the ScA, primarily of occlusion one, extrathoracic interventions prevail in the form of carotid-subclavian bypass and carotid-subclavian transposition. According to our analysis, the results of carotid-subclavian transposition prove to be more preferable. In the endovascular intervention on the ScA, balloon angioplasty is used with possible stenting. In the analysis, we found no differences in the long-term patency between angioplasty and stenting, although the extent of technical success was higher in the group of stenting. In case of stenosis of the ScA, the world medicine gives priority to endovascular methods. To date, there are no sharply defined criteria permitting to choose between the open and endovascular interventions for treatment of the ScA occlusion, although a probable technical failure of endovascular revascularization and higher long-term patency give priority to open surgery. As for symptomatic stenosis of VA, to date there is no evidence of the advantage of stenting over conservative therapy. Thus, surgical intervention should rather be used in case the drug treatment is ineffective. The same can be said about the open reconstruction of the VA, except for the cases of contraindications for stenting of the VA, for example, its tortuosity.
血管外科治疗椎基底动脉功能不全的成就与展望
椎基底动脉功能不全(VBI)仍然是现代医学中的一个重要问题,因为大约四分之一的脑梗死发生在脑后循环。这些中风伴随着严重的后果和重复事件的高风险。本文介绍了目前的概念,手术治疗病变的锁骨下(ScA)和椎动脉(VA)负责VBI的发展。在对症性ScA病变的开放手术治疗中,主要是闭塞性ScA,胸外干预以颈动脉-锁骨下搭桥和颈动脉-锁骨下转位的形式为主。根据我们的分析,颈动脉-锁骨下转位的效果更佳。在ScA的血管内介入治疗中,球囊血管成形术与可能的支架植入一起使用。在分析中,我们发现血管成形术和支架置入术在长期通畅方面没有差异,尽管支架置入术组的技术成功程度更高。对于冠脉狭窄的情况,国际医学以血管内治疗为主。迄今为止,没有明确的标准允许在开放和血管内介入治疗ScA闭塞之间进行选择,尽管血管内血运重建可能的技术失败和更高的长期通畅优先考虑开放手术。对于有症状的室间隔狭窄,迄今为止没有证据表明支架置入优于保守治疗。因此,在药物治疗无效的情况下,应采用手术干预。对于静脉曲张的开放性重建也是如此,除了静脉曲张支架的禁忌症,比如它的扭曲。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信