Accurate Human Palm Recognition System in Cybercrime Analysis using Naive Bayes in comparison with Decision Tree

Aigi Saisundar, D. T
{"title":"Accurate Human Palm Recognition System in Cybercrime Analysis using Naive Bayes in comparison with Decision Tree","authors":"Aigi Saisundar, D. T","doi":"10.1109/ICECONF57129.2023.10083899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: Main purpose for research work accurately recognizing human palm in cybercrime analysis using Naive Bayes (NB) and Decision Tree (DT) and palm recognition helps to identify a person easily. Materials and Methods: The proposed algorithm is Naive Bayes and the compared algorithm is Decision Tree. Both the algorithms work on human palm recognition for accuracy. Accuracy is analysed for human palm recognition. Naive Bayes is an act of processing technique based on Bayes' theorem. Decision Tree place with the group of guided learning calculations. Dissimilar with machine learning calculations, calculations related to decision trees take care of relapse and grouping issues. Palm recognition is performed by a Naive Bayes with size of sample $(\\mathrm{N}=23)$ as well as Decision Tree of sample size $(\\mathrm{N}=23)$, G-power takes 80%. Result: Naive Bayes (NB) accuracy is 94.173% along with Decision Tree (DT) of 91.739%. There is a significant contrast among two groups whose significance value 0.215 $(\\mathrm{p} > 0.05)$. Conclusion: Naive Bayes (NB) generate better accuracy compared with Decision Tree (DT) in accuracy of human palm recognition in cybercrime analysis.","PeriodicalId":436733,"journal":{"name":"2023 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Knowledge Discovery in Concurrent Engineering (ICECONF)","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Knowledge Discovery in Concurrent Engineering (ICECONF)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECONF57129.2023.10083899","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Main purpose for research work accurately recognizing human palm in cybercrime analysis using Naive Bayes (NB) and Decision Tree (DT) and palm recognition helps to identify a person easily. Materials and Methods: The proposed algorithm is Naive Bayes and the compared algorithm is Decision Tree. Both the algorithms work on human palm recognition for accuracy. Accuracy is analysed for human palm recognition. Naive Bayes is an act of processing technique based on Bayes' theorem. Decision Tree place with the group of guided learning calculations. Dissimilar with machine learning calculations, calculations related to decision trees take care of relapse and grouping issues. Palm recognition is performed by a Naive Bayes with size of sample $(\mathrm{N}=23)$ as well as Decision Tree of sample size $(\mathrm{N}=23)$, G-power takes 80%. Result: Naive Bayes (NB) accuracy is 94.173% along with Decision Tree (DT) of 91.739%. There is a significant contrast among two groups whose significance value 0.215 $(\mathrm{p} > 0.05)$. Conclusion: Naive Bayes (NB) generate better accuracy compared with Decision Tree (DT) in accuracy of human palm recognition in cybercrime analysis.
基于朴素贝叶斯与决策树的准确手掌识别系统在网络犯罪分析中的应用
目的:研究工作的主要目的是利用朴素贝叶斯(NB)和决策树(DT)在网络犯罪分析中准确识别人的手掌,手掌识别有助于轻松识别人。材料与方法:本文提出的算法为朴素贝叶斯,比较算法为决策树。这两种算法都适用于人类手掌识别的准确性。分析了人类手掌识别的准确性。朴素贝叶斯是一种基于贝叶斯定理的处理技术。用决策树的位置进行分组指导学习计算。与机器学习计算不同,与决策树相关的计算处理复发和分组问题。掌纹识别由样本大小为$(\mathrm{N}=23)$的朴素贝叶斯和样本大小为$(\mathrm{N}=23)$的决策树进行,g功率为80%。结果:朴素贝叶斯(NB)准确率为94.173%,决策树(DT)准确率为91.739%。两组间差异显著,显著性值为0.215 $(\ mathm {p} > 0.05)$。结论:与决策树(DT)相比,朴素贝叶斯(NB)在网络犯罪人脸识别中的准确率更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信