Determinants of effective university–business collaboration

A. Alrajhi, Necati Aydin
{"title":"Determinants of effective university–business collaboration","authors":"A. Alrajhi, Necati Aydin","doi":"10.1108/jiuc-05-2019-0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe attention to the university–business collaboration (UBC) for its role in the knowledge-based economy is growing in many countries. In this context, the purpose of this paper is to conduct two surveys to explore the causes of low collaboration between the private sector and academia in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe first survey covers nearly 50 companies to learn their perspectives. Using the findings of the first survey, a second survey was conducted of university researchers to understand the determinants of private and public funding of research and development projects. The survey provided two types of data, namely, categorical and continuous, which were subjected to reliability and normality tests. A linear regression analysis also was utilized to explore the role of different factors on the funded projects by the two sectors.\n\n\nFindings\nThere is a perception among researchers that the private sector is woefully underestimating research capacity of Saudi universities. One interesting finding is that publishing in journals from the International Scientific Indexing (ISI) is a strong predictor for government funding, but not for private funding. From the private sector perspective, publishing in ISI-indexed journals is not sufficient evidence of research capability. Moreover, high teaching load is a major obstacle in acquiring private funding, but not so for public funding.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe paper provides two main recommendations to improve collaboration. First, universities should incentivize publishing in high-impact journals more than in ISI-indexed journals to increase the faculty’s research capabilities. Second, universities should reduce the teaching load of faculty involved in research projects, particularly those funded by the private sector.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe outcomes of this survey-based study are very valuable to the ecosystem of academia, business and government in general and for Saudi Arabia in particular, where there is a vital need to implement the right policies regarding UBC in the country.\n","PeriodicalId":322108,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Industry-University Collaboration","volume":"495 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Industry-University Collaboration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jiuc-05-2019-0011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Purpose The attention to the university–business collaboration (UBC) for its role in the knowledge-based economy is growing in many countries. In this context, the purpose of this paper is to conduct two surveys to explore the causes of low collaboration between the private sector and academia in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Design/methodology/approach The first survey covers nearly 50 companies to learn their perspectives. Using the findings of the first survey, a second survey was conducted of university researchers to understand the determinants of private and public funding of research and development projects. The survey provided two types of data, namely, categorical and continuous, which were subjected to reliability and normality tests. A linear regression analysis also was utilized to explore the role of different factors on the funded projects by the two sectors. Findings There is a perception among researchers that the private sector is woefully underestimating research capacity of Saudi universities. One interesting finding is that publishing in journals from the International Scientific Indexing (ISI) is a strong predictor for government funding, but not for private funding. From the private sector perspective, publishing in ISI-indexed journals is not sufficient evidence of research capability. Moreover, high teaching load is a major obstacle in acquiring private funding, but not so for public funding. Practical implications The paper provides two main recommendations to improve collaboration. First, universities should incentivize publishing in high-impact journals more than in ISI-indexed journals to increase the faculty’s research capabilities. Second, universities should reduce the teaching load of faculty involved in research projects, particularly those funded by the private sector. Originality/value The outcomes of this survey-based study are very valuable to the ecosystem of academia, business and government in general and for Saudi Arabia in particular, where there is a vital need to implement the right policies regarding UBC in the country.
大学与企业有效合作的决定因素
在知识经济时代,许多国家越来越重视校企合作的作用。在此背景下,本文的目的是进行两项调查,以探讨沙特阿拉伯王国私营部门与学术界之间合作不足的原因。设计/方法/方法第一次调查涵盖了近50家公司,以了解他们的观点。利用第一次调查的结果,对大学研究人员进行了第二次调查,以了解私人和公共资助研发项目的决定因素。调查提供了两种类型的数据,即分类和连续,并进行了信度和正态性检验。并利用线性回归分析探讨不同因素对两部门资助项目的影响。研究人员有一种看法,认为私营部门严重低估了沙特大学的研究能力。一个有趣的发现是,在国际科学索引(ISI)的期刊上发表论文是政府资助的一个强有力的预测指标,而不是私人资助。从私营部门的角度来看,在isi索引期刊上发表论文不足以证明研究能力。此外,高教学负荷是获得私人资金的主要障碍,但对公共资金来说并非如此。本文提出了两项主要建议,以改善协作。首先,大学应该鼓励在高影响力期刊上发表论文,而不是在isi索引期刊上发表论文,以提高教师的研究能力。其次,大学应该减轻参与研究项目的教师的教学负担,特别是那些由私营部门资助的项目。独创性/价值这项基于调查的研究结果对学术界、商界和政府的生态系统非常有价值,特别是对沙特阿拉伯来说,因为沙特阿拉伯迫切需要在该国实施有关UBC的正确政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信