Essential Ingredients of Effective Project Management: A Case Study of Project Execution in the South Pars Mega-Projects

V. Daneshkhah, Gholamreza Younesi, Meisam Karbalaee Akbari, Hamed Daneshkhah
{"title":"Essential Ingredients of Effective Project Management: A Case Study of Project Execution in the South Pars Mega-Projects","authors":"V. Daneshkhah, Gholamreza Younesi, Meisam Karbalaee Akbari, Hamed Daneshkhah","doi":"10.2118/214032-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n During the past decades hundreds of wells have been constructed in the giant South Pars gas field with different approaches and methodologies leading to diverse outcomes and results. Interestingly enough there have been many operators in the field with distinct performances yet by deploying the same vendors and service providers held in common. By considering that it is statistically proven that the larger the project budget, there are higher chances for failure, effective tailoring of methodologies in large scale mega-projects would be crucial and decisive. In many cases failures are a consequence of simply applying methodologies already experienced in small scale projects on complex and sophisticated projects with a variety of influential factors and a huge network of stakeholders. The study has provided an insight on how effective approaches in project management or conversely mismanagement could play as the main rout cause in a chain of events corresponding to either saved time or Non-Productive Times in well construction operations by presenting real cases elaborated in detail.\n Cases show how failure in collecting requirements and recognizing the interdependencies among each necessity in the early stages of the project and subsequently overlooking the related cost, time and risks could cause massive cumulative financial loss. Additionally, failure to recognize wise investments in vendors and service providers as the 1-10-100 rule which explains how failure to take notice of one initial investment escalates the financial loss exponentially would have staggering consequences. The current paper explains how being proactive in an extensive planning phase could ease the execution stage as a great investment in time spent. From a human resource perspective, it has been demonstrated that how the ability and skills of the project team e.g. effective communication in complex networks with multiple reporting relationships and data-driven decisions by statistics could prevent cognitive biases and errors in decision making. Furthermore, powerful alignments come from shared and common motivations and morale for all engaged parties and the supply chain being service providers, rig contractors or the field operator and there should be an answer to the question, what's in it for me when asked by each of these parties.\n Overall the study presents real cases and lessons learned showing how the main rout causes of Non-Productive Times could go back deeply to ineffective project approaches from a project management perspective in a system dynamic chain of events rather than to just address the emerged symptoms of failure in drilling operation.","PeriodicalId":286390,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Mon, March 13, 2023","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Mon, March 13, 2023","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/214032-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During the past decades hundreds of wells have been constructed in the giant South Pars gas field with different approaches and methodologies leading to diverse outcomes and results. Interestingly enough there have been many operators in the field with distinct performances yet by deploying the same vendors and service providers held in common. By considering that it is statistically proven that the larger the project budget, there are higher chances for failure, effective tailoring of methodologies in large scale mega-projects would be crucial and decisive. In many cases failures are a consequence of simply applying methodologies already experienced in small scale projects on complex and sophisticated projects with a variety of influential factors and a huge network of stakeholders. The study has provided an insight on how effective approaches in project management or conversely mismanagement could play as the main rout cause in a chain of events corresponding to either saved time or Non-Productive Times in well construction operations by presenting real cases elaborated in detail. Cases show how failure in collecting requirements and recognizing the interdependencies among each necessity in the early stages of the project and subsequently overlooking the related cost, time and risks could cause massive cumulative financial loss. Additionally, failure to recognize wise investments in vendors and service providers as the 1-10-100 rule which explains how failure to take notice of one initial investment escalates the financial loss exponentially would have staggering consequences. The current paper explains how being proactive in an extensive planning phase could ease the execution stage as a great investment in time spent. From a human resource perspective, it has been demonstrated that how the ability and skills of the project team e.g. effective communication in complex networks with multiple reporting relationships and data-driven decisions by statistics could prevent cognitive biases and errors in decision making. Furthermore, powerful alignments come from shared and common motivations and morale for all engaged parties and the supply chain being service providers, rig contractors or the field operator and there should be an answer to the question, what's in it for me when asked by each of these parties. Overall the study presents real cases and lessons learned showing how the main rout causes of Non-Productive Times could go back deeply to ineffective project approaches from a project management perspective in a system dynamic chain of events rather than to just address the emerged symptoms of failure in drilling operation.
有效项目管理的基本要素:南帕尔斯大型项目项目执行案例研究
在过去的几十年里,在South Pars大气田,人们用不同的方法和方法建造了数百口井,导致了不同的结果和结果。有趣的是,在该领域有许多运营商通过部署相同的供应商和服务提供商来实现不同的性能。考虑到统计证明项目预算越大,失败的可能性就越大,因此在大型大型项目中有效地剪裁方法将是至关重要和决定性的。在许多情况下,失败是简单地将小型项目中已有经验的方法应用于具有各种影响因素和庞大利益相关者网络的复杂和复杂项目的结果。该研究通过详细阐述的实际案例,深入了解了项目管理中的有效方法或相反的管理不善如何成为一系列事件的主要原因,从而节省了建井作业的时间或造成了非生产时间。案例表明,在项目的早期阶段,未能收集需求并认识到每个需求之间的相互依赖关系,以及随后忽视相关的成本、时间和风险,可能会导致大量累积的财务损失。此外,未能认识到对供应商和服务提供商的明智投资就像1-10-100规则一样,解释了为什么没有注意到一项初始投资会成倍增加财务损失,这将产生惊人的后果。当前的论文解释了在广泛的计划阶段积极主动如何简化执行阶段,因为这是一项巨大的时间投资。从人力资源的角度来看,已经证明了项目团队的能力和技能,例如在具有多个报告关系的复杂网络中的有效沟通和统计数据驱动的决策,如何防止决策中的认知偏差和错误。此外,强大的联盟来自于所有参与方和供应链(服务提供商、钻机承包商或现场运营商)的共同动机和士气,当这些参与方提出问题时,我应该得到一个答案。总的来说,该研究提供了真实的案例和经验教训,从项目管理的角度来看,从系统动态事件链的角度来看,非生产时间的主要原因可以追溯到无效的项目方法,而不仅仅是解决钻井作业中出现的故障症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信