Comparative Bioactivity Study of 45S5 and 58S Bioglasses in Organic and Inorganic Environment

G. Theodorou, O. Goudouri, E. Kontonasaki, X. Chatzistavrou, L. Papadopoulou, N. Kantiranis, K. Paraskevopoulos
{"title":"Comparative Bioactivity Study of 45S5 and 58S Bioglasses in Organic and Inorganic Environment","authors":"G. Theodorou, O. Goudouri, E. Kontonasaki, X. Chatzistavrou, L. Papadopoulou, N. Kantiranis, K. Paraskevopoulos","doi":"10.4303/BDA/D110154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Melt derived bioactive glasses and sol-gel derived glasses have been extensively investigated and are reported to be bioactive. Investigation of the bioactivity was conducted in different media, like conventional Simulated Body Fluid (c-SBF), Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium (DMEM) and Tris buffer solution. The aim of this work is to investigate and evaluate thein vitro bioactivity assessment of two commonly used bioactive glasses- 45S5 and 58S-soaked in DMEM and c-SBF, in order to compare the biological response of both glasses in organic and inorganic environ- ments. For the samples immersed in c-SBF, the onset of apatite formation on the surface of 45S5 grains was slightly delayed in comparison to 58S. After 3 days in DMEM 58S powders revealed the formation of a crystalline HCAp phase on the surface of all grains in contrary to 45S5, where a sparsely developed amorphous apatite phase was developed.","PeriodicalId":127691,"journal":{"name":"Bioceramics Development and Applications","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"30","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioceramics Development and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4303/BDA/D110154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 30

Abstract

Melt derived bioactive glasses and sol-gel derived glasses have been extensively investigated and are reported to be bioactive. Investigation of the bioactivity was conducted in different media, like conventional Simulated Body Fluid (c-SBF), Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium (DMEM) and Tris buffer solution. The aim of this work is to investigate and evaluate thein vitro bioactivity assessment of two commonly used bioactive glasses- 45S5 and 58S-soaked in DMEM and c-SBF, in order to compare the biological response of both glasses in organic and inorganic environ- ments. For the samples immersed in c-SBF, the onset of apatite formation on the surface of 45S5 grains was slightly delayed in comparison to 58S. After 3 days in DMEM 58S powders revealed the formation of a crystalline HCAp phase on the surface of all grains in contrary to 45S5, where a sparsely developed amorphous apatite phase was developed.
45S5和58S生物玻璃在有机和无机环境中的生物活性比较研究
熔融衍生的生物活性玻璃和溶胶-凝胶衍生的玻璃已被广泛研究并报道具有生物活性。在常规模拟体液(c-SBF)、Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium (DMEM)和Tris缓冲液等不同培养基中进行生物活性研究。本研究的目的是研究和评价两种常用的生物活性玻璃- 45S5和58s -在DMEM和c-SBF中浸泡的体外生物活性评价,以比较两种玻璃在有机和无机环境中的生物反应。在c-SBF中,45S5晶粒表面磷灰石形成的开始时间略晚于58S。在DMEM 58S粉末中放置3天后,发现所有颗粒表面都形成了结晶的HCAp相,而45S5则相反,在45S5中,形成了稀疏发育的无定形磷灰石相。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信