Estimation of OGIP in a Water-Drive Gas Reservoir Coupling Dynamic Material Balance and Fetkovich Aquifer Model

Sebastian Zavaleta, P. M. Adrian, Ricardo Marcelo Michel
{"title":"Estimation of OGIP in a Water-Drive Gas Reservoir Coupling Dynamic Material Balance and Fetkovich Aquifer Model","authors":"Sebastian Zavaleta, P. M. Adrian, Ricardo Marcelo Michel","doi":"10.2118/191224-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Although various novel techniques were developed in reservoir engineering for estimation of hydrocarbons initially in place (HCIIP), conventional material balance still remains as one of the most reliable. Average reservoir pressure is critical input data for material balance, which is usually obtained by well shut-in. Nevertheless, this operation might be restricted due to economic and operational restrictions such as water production in gas wells.\n In contrast, daily production data is commonly available and can be used to calculate the HCIIP by applying any production data analysis techniques such as the Dynamic Material Balance (DMB) method. The application of such methods to volumetric gas reservoirs and naturally fractured reservoirs resulted in accurate and reliable estimations. However, for water drive gas reservoirs, where the water influx term should be introduced into the iterative process, research and field case applications are limited.\n This paper presents an extension to the DMB technique to water-drive gas reservoirs. A simultaneous estimation of the Original Gas-in-place (OGIP) and the water influx term is achieved by coupling the DMB technique with the Fetkovich aquifer model. Average reservoir pressure estimation can also be attained as a result of the coupled method.\n Results were validated by means of numerical simulation on a synthetic model and a field study case. Synthetic production data was generated by a commercial simulator and then analized with the coupled method. The calculated OGIP, water influx volumes and average reservoir pressure resulted comparable to simulator output as they presented a low relative error. Furthermore, application of the coupled method to the field study case yielded comparable results to those obtained by volumetric method.","PeriodicalId":415543,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, June 26, 2018","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, June 26, 2018","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/191224-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Although various novel techniques were developed in reservoir engineering for estimation of hydrocarbons initially in place (HCIIP), conventional material balance still remains as one of the most reliable. Average reservoir pressure is critical input data for material balance, which is usually obtained by well shut-in. Nevertheless, this operation might be restricted due to economic and operational restrictions such as water production in gas wells. In contrast, daily production data is commonly available and can be used to calculate the HCIIP by applying any production data analysis techniques such as the Dynamic Material Balance (DMB) method. The application of such methods to volumetric gas reservoirs and naturally fractured reservoirs resulted in accurate and reliable estimations. However, for water drive gas reservoirs, where the water influx term should be introduced into the iterative process, research and field case applications are limited. This paper presents an extension to the DMB technique to water-drive gas reservoirs. A simultaneous estimation of the Original Gas-in-place (OGIP) and the water influx term is achieved by coupling the DMB technique with the Fetkovich aquifer model. Average reservoir pressure estimation can also be attained as a result of the coupled method. Results were validated by means of numerical simulation on a synthetic model and a field study case. Synthetic production data was generated by a commercial simulator and then analized with the coupled method. The calculated OGIP, water influx volumes and average reservoir pressure resulted comparable to simulator output as they presented a low relative error. Furthermore, application of the coupled method to the field study case yielded comparable results to those obtained by volumetric method.
水驱气藏OGIP耦合动态物质平衡与Fetkovich含水层模型估算
尽管在油藏工程中开发了各种新技术来估计初始位置的碳氢化合物(HCIIP),但传统的物质平衡仍然是最可靠的方法之一。平均储层压力是物料平衡的关键输入数据,通常通过关井获得。然而,由于经济和操作方面的限制,例如气井的产水,这种操作可能会受到限制。相比之下,日常生产数据通常是可用的,可以通过应用任何生产数据分析技术(如动态材料平衡(DMB)方法)来计算HCIIP。将该方法应用于体积型气藏和天然裂缝型气藏,获得了准确可靠的估计结果。然而,对于水驱气藏,需要在迭代过程中引入水侵项,研究和现场案例应用有限。本文介绍了DMB技术在水驱气藏中的推广。通过将DMB技术与Fetkovich含水层模型相结合,实现了原始原地含气(OGIP)和水侵期的同时估计。耦合方法还可以得到平均储层压力的估计。通过综合模型的数值模拟和现场实例验证了结果的正确性。利用商用仿真器生成综合生产数据,并用耦合方法对数据进行分析。计算得到的OGIP、水侵量和平均油藏压力与模拟器输出相当,相对误差较小。此外,将耦合方法应用于现场研究实例,得到了与体积法相当的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信