'Tradition' and the Solitary Singer: Taking Exception to T.S. Eliot's Literary Legacy

Kate Klonowski
{"title":"'Tradition' and the Solitary Singer: Taking Exception to T.S. Eliot's Literary Legacy","authors":"Kate Klonowski","doi":"10.5070/B3211007660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"T.S. Eliot and Walt Whitman, two of the most monumental figures and divergent thinkers in American poetic history, are quite radically opposed to one another in terms of conceptual bent. Whitman, the poet of the body and buoyant personality, and Eliot, champion of cerebral and hermetic verse, do not seem, therefore, to offer anything in the way of theoretical permeability. Nonetheless, in this essay I attempt to re-evaluate Eliot’s most elemental essay upon “Tradition and the Individual Talent” in order to assess just how accommodating this text is toward the “individual” and the most “solitary” of singers, Whitman himself. My method is informed by a close analysis of Eliot’s discursive technique, and how this past-immersed perspective often leaves off a more “lively” vital and aesthetic envisioning proffered by his poetic predecessor. In short, I work toward the ultimate aim of demonstrating the broader applicability of Eliot’s treatise toward Whitman, and how the earlier poet, although less identifiable with any theory of “fixed” tradition, masterfully inaugurates a precipatory paradigm of poetic creation.","PeriodicalId":243071,"journal":{"name":"Berkeley Undergraduate Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Berkeley Undergraduate Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5070/B3211007660","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

T.S. Eliot and Walt Whitman, two of the most monumental figures and divergent thinkers in American poetic history, are quite radically opposed to one another in terms of conceptual bent. Whitman, the poet of the body and buoyant personality, and Eliot, champion of cerebral and hermetic verse, do not seem, therefore, to offer anything in the way of theoretical permeability. Nonetheless, in this essay I attempt to re-evaluate Eliot’s most elemental essay upon “Tradition and the Individual Talent” in order to assess just how accommodating this text is toward the “individual” and the most “solitary” of singers, Whitman himself. My method is informed by a close analysis of Eliot’s discursive technique, and how this past-immersed perspective often leaves off a more “lively” vital and aesthetic envisioning proffered by his poetic predecessor. In short, I work toward the ultimate aim of demonstrating the broader applicability of Eliot’s treatise toward Whitman, and how the earlier poet, although less identifiable with any theory of “fixed” tradition, masterfully inaugurates a precipatory paradigm of poetic creation.
“传统”与孤独的歌手:对T.S.艾略特文学遗产的批判
艾略特和惠特曼是美国诗史上两位最具里程碑意义的人物,也是最具分歧的思想家,他们在概念倾向上是截然相反的。惠特曼是描写身体和活泼个性的诗人,艾略特是描写理智和封闭的诗歌的先锋,因此,他们似乎没有提供任何理论渗透性方面的东西。尽管如此,在这篇文章中,我试图重新评价艾略特关于“传统与个人才能”的最基本的文章,以评估这篇文章对“个人”和最“孤独”的歌手惠特曼本人的适应程度。我的方法是通过对艾略特的话语技巧的仔细分析,以及这种沉浸在过去的视角如何经常遗漏了他的诗歌前辈所提供的更“生动”的、重要的和审美的设想。简而言之,我的最终目标是证明艾略特的论文对惠特曼的更广泛的适用性,以及这位早期诗人如何巧妙地开创了一种诗歌创作的预知范式,尽管他与任何“固定”传统理论都不太一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信