An Exploration of Teacher Preparation Practices with Foundational Knowledge of Literacy

Marla K. Robertson, L. Sharp, Roberta D. Raymond, Rebekah E. Piper
{"title":"An Exploration of Teacher Preparation Practices with Foundational Knowledge of Literacy","authors":"Marla K. Robertson, L. Sharp, Roberta D. Raymond, Rebekah E. Piper","doi":"10.15760/nwjte.2020.15.3.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The newly released Standards for the Preparation of Literacy Professionals 2017 published by the International Literacy Association provide the basis for high-quality teacher preparation with literacy . This study was part of a larger study that was conducted to explore preparation practices that teacher educators use to promote understandings among preservice teachers for each grade-level band (i.e., Pre-K/Primary, Elementary/Intermediate, Middle/High School). The larger study was a national endeavor that used a researcher-created survey to ascertain viewpoints from teacher educators affiliated with teacher preparation programs located in the United States. For this study, the researchers retrieved qualitative survey responses related to Standard 1: Foundational Knowledge from 132 survey respondents who were mostly seasoned teaching professionals with doctoral degrees. The researchers used conceptualizations of teacher knowledge as a theoretical lens to better understand reported preparation practices. Data were analyzed systematically with three coding cycles from which three themes emerged: Teacher Educator Pedagogy, Course Content, Student and Program Expectations. The researchers also compared data collected to the components of literacy associated with Standard 1: Foundational Knowledge and learned that teacher educators do not use preparation practices that evenly focus on all components of literacy. Based upon these findings, the researchers contended that teacher educators must examine their respective preparation program curricula to ensure that all components of literacy associated with foundational knowledge are addressed sufficiently.","PeriodicalId":298118,"journal":{"name":"Northwest Journal of Teacher Education","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Northwest Journal of Teacher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15760/nwjte.2020.15.3.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The newly released Standards for the Preparation of Literacy Professionals 2017 published by the International Literacy Association provide the basis for high-quality teacher preparation with literacy . This study was part of a larger study that was conducted to explore preparation practices that teacher educators use to promote understandings among preservice teachers for each grade-level band (i.e., Pre-K/Primary, Elementary/Intermediate, Middle/High School). The larger study was a national endeavor that used a researcher-created survey to ascertain viewpoints from teacher educators affiliated with teacher preparation programs located in the United States. For this study, the researchers retrieved qualitative survey responses related to Standard 1: Foundational Knowledge from 132 survey respondents who were mostly seasoned teaching professionals with doctoral degrees. The researchers used conceptualizations of teacher knowledge as a theoretical lens to better understand reported preparation practices. Data were analyzed systematically with three coding cycles from which three themes emerged: Teacher Educator Pedagogy, Course Content, Student and Program Expectations. The researchers also compared data collected to the components of literacy associated with Standard 1: Foundational Knowledge and learned that teacher educators do not use preparation practices that evenly focus on all components of literacy. Based upon these findings, the researchers contended that teacher educators must examine their respective preparation program curricula to ensure that all components of literacy associated with foundational knowledge are addressed sufficiently.
基于识字基础知识的教师备课实践探索
国际扫盲协会最新发布的《2017年扫盲专业人才培养标准》为高质量的扫盲教师培养奠定了基础。本研究是一项大型研究的一部分,该研究旨在探索教师教育工作者用来促进职前教师对每个年级(即学前/小学、小学/中级、初中/高中)理解的准备实践。这项规模更大的研究是一项全国性的努力,它使用了一项研究人员创建的调查来确定来自美国教师准备项目的教师教育者的观点。在这项研究中,研究人员从132名调查对象中检索了与标准1:基础知识相关的定性调查反馈,这些调查对象大多是拥有博士学位的经验丰富的教学专业人员。研究人员使用教师知识的概念化作为一个理论镜头,以更好地理解报告的准备实践。通过三个编码周期对数据进行系统分析,从中出现了三个主题:教师教育教育学、课程内容、学生和项目期望。研究人员还将收集到的数据与标准1:基础知识相关的读写能力组成部分进行了比较,并了解到教师教育工作者并没有均匀地关注读写能力的所有组成部分。基于这些发现,研究人员认为,教师教育者必须检查他们各自的准备课程,以确保与基础知识相关的识字的所有组成部分得到充分解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信