Implementing AI Ethics: Making Sense of the Ethical Requirements

M. Agbese, Rahul Mohanani, A. Khan, P. Abrahamsson
{"title":"Implementing AI Ethics: Making Sense of the Ethical Requirements","authors":"M. Agbese, Rahul Mohanani, A. Khan, P. Abrahamsson","doi":"10.1145/3593434.3593453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Society’s increasing dependence on Artificial Intelligence (AI) and AI-enabled systems require a more practical approach from software engineering (SE) executives in middle and higher-level management to improve their involvement in implementing AI ethics by making ethical requirements part of their management practices. However, research indicates that most work on implementing ethical requirements in SE management primarily focuses on technical development, with scarce findings for middle and higher-level management. We investigate this by interviewing ten Finnish SE executives in middle and higher-level management to examine how they consider and implement ethical requirements. We use ethical requirements from the European Union (EU) Trustworthy Ethics guidelines for Trustworthy AI as our reference for ethical requirements and an Agile portfolio management framework to analyze implementation. Our findings reveal a general consideration of privacy and data governance ethical requirements as legal requirements with no other consideration for ethical requirements identified. The findings also show practicable consideration of ethical requirements as technical robustness and safety for implementation as risk requirements and societal and environmental well-being for implementation as sustainability requirements. We examine a practical approach to implementing ethical requirements using the ethical risk requirements stack employing the Agile portfolio management framework.","PeriodicalId":178596,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3593434.3593453","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Society’s increasing dependence on Artificial Intelligence (AI) and AI-enabled systems require a more practical approach from software engineering (SE) executives in middle and higher-level management to improve their involvement in implementing AI ethics by making ethical requirements part of their management practices. However, research indicates that most work on implementing ethical requirements in SE management primarily focuses on technical development, with scarce findings for middle and higher-level management. We investigate this by interviewing ten Finnish SE executives in middle and higher-level management to examine how they consider and implement ethical requirements. We use ethical requirements from the European Union (EU) Trustworthy Ethics guidelines for Trustworthy AI as our reference for ethical requirements and an Agile portfolio management framework to analyze implementation. Our findings reveal a general consideration of privacy and data governance ethical requirements as legal requirements with no other consideration for ethical requirements identified. The findings also show practicable consideration of ethical requirements as technical robustness and safety for implementation as risk requirements and societal and environmental well-being for implementation as sustainability requirements. We examine a practical approach to implementing ethical requirements using the ethical risk requirements stack employing the Agile portfolio management framework.
实施人工智能伦理:理解伦理要求
社会对人工智能(AI)和支持AI的系统的日益依赖,要求中层和高层管理中的软件工程(SE)高管采取更实际的方法,通过将道德要求作为其管理实践的一部分,提高他们对实施人工智能伦理的参与度。然而,研究表明,在SE管理中实施道德要求的大多数工作主要集中在技术开发上,很少有针对中高层管理的研究成果。我们通过采访十位芬兰中小企业的中高层管理人员来调查他们是如何考虑和实施道德要求的。我们使用欧盟(EU)可信赖AI的可信赖道德准则的道德要求作为道德要求的参考,并使用敏捷投资组合管理框架来分析实现。我们的研究结果表明,一般将隐私和数据治理道德要求视为法律要求,而没有确定其他道德要求的考虑。研究结果还表明,将道德要求作为技术稳健性,将实施的安全性作为风险要求,将社会和环境福祉作为可持续性要求。我们研究了一种实用的方法来实现道德需求,使用使用敏捷投资组合管理框架的道德风险需求堆栈。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信