Usefulness and Adoption of Palay Check (Rice Check) Technology

Andrea May Malonzo, J. Aveno, D. Vargas, Jocelyn Dollente
{"title":"Usefulness and Adoption of Palay Check (Rice Check) Technology","authors":"Andrea May Malonzo, J. Aveno, D. Vargas, Jocelyn Dollente","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3831814","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study aimed to determine the usefulness and adoption of Palay Check ( Rice check) technology. The study used both qualitative and quantitative methods, specifically correlational and case study research designs. Respondents of the study were the 78 small-holder farmers in San Mateo, Isabela. The study employed a purposive sampling method wherein the whole population of interest was taken as respondents of the study. were used to gather data in this study. Respondents' attitude towards the usefulness of the PalayCheck™ technology and the majority of the component technologies was rated as very useful. Compared to the respondents’ perceived usefulness of the eight key checks of the PalayCheck™ system, their perceived ease of use of the key checks received relatively lower mean scores. Out of eight (8) key checks, only two were perceived as “very easy to use”—these are nutrient management and harvest management. The component technologies under seed and variety were rated as “very easy to use” despite the lower mean rate for key check 1 Used high-quality seeds of a recommended Variety. For crop establishment, only five (5) out of 13 component technologies were perceived as “very easy to follow. Out of five (5) component technologies for Nutrient Management, only the first nutrient application was perceived as “very easy to use. For water management, alternate wetting and drying were perceived as \"easy to use\". All component technologies under pest management, recommended practices on threshing and harvesting, were perceived as “very easy to use” by the respondents. The majority of the respondents claimed they adopted all key Key Checks such as the use of quality seed of a recommended variety, no high and low soil spots after a final leveling. the practice of synchronous planting which enables efficient use of irrigation and minimizes spread of pest and diseases in a farm area, \"ensuring that there are enough healthy seedlings\", \"ensuring enough nutrients from tillering to early panicle initiation and flowering. ensuring enough water supply was based on how far the farm area is from the source of irrigation. No significant yield loss due to pests and cut and threshed the crop at the right time.","PeriodicalId":429425,"journal":{"name":"AARN: Agriculture (Topic)","volume":"86 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AARN: Agriculture (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3831814","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study aimed to determine the usefulness and adoption of Palay Check ( Rice check) technology. The study used both qualitative and quantitative methods, specifically correlational and case study research designs. Respondents of the study were the 78 small-holder farmers in San Mateo, Isabela. The study employed a purposive sampling method wherein the whole population of interest was taken as respondents of the study. were used to gather data in this study. Respondents' attitude towards the usefulness of the PalayCheck™ technology and the majority of the component technologies was rated as very useful. Compared to the respondents’ perceived usefulness of the eight key checks of the PalayCheck™ system, their perceived ease of use of the key checks received relatively lower mean scores. Out of eight (8) key checks, only two were perceived as “very easy to use”—these are nutrient management and harvest management. The component technologies under seed and variety were rated as “very easy to use” despite the lower mean rate for key check 1 Used high-quality seeds of a recommended Variety. For crop establishment, only five (5) out of 13 component technologies were perceived as “very easy to follow. Out of five (5) component technologies for Nutrient Management, only the first nutrient application was perceived as “very easy to use. For water management, alternate wetting and drying were perceived as "easy to use". All component technologies under pest management, recommended practices on threshing and harvesting, were perceived as “very easy to use” by the respondents. The majority of the respondents claimed they adopted all key Key Checks such as the use of quality seed of a recommended variety, no high and low soil spots after a final leveling. the practice of synchronous planting which enables efficient use of irrigation and minimizes spread of pest and diseases in a farm area, "ensuring that there are enough healthy seedlings", "ensuring enough nutrients from tillering to early panicle initiation and flowering. ensuring enough water supply was based on how far the farm area is from the source of irrigation. No significant yield loss due to pests and cut and threshed the crop at the right time.
大米检查技术的有用性和采用
本研究旨在确定Palay Check (Rice Check)技术的有用性和采用情况。该研究使用了定性和定量方法,特别是相关研究和案例研究设计。该研究的受访者是伊莎贝拉圣马特奥的78名小农户。本研究采用了有目的的抽样方法,将整个感兴趣的人群作为研究的受访者。用来收集本研究的数据。受访者对PalayCheck™技术和大多数组件技术的有用性的态度被评为非常有用。与受访者对PalayCheck™系统的八个关键检查的感知有用性相比,他们对关键检查的易用性的感知得分相对较低。在八项关键检查中,只有两项被认为“非常容易使用”,即养分管理和收获管理。种子和品种项下的组成技术被评为“非常容易使用”,尽管关键检查的平均比率较低1使用推荐品种的优质种子。对于作物种植,13个组成技术中只有5个被认为“非常容易遵循”。在营养管理的五(5)组件技术中,只有第一种营养应用被认为“非常容易使用”。对于水管理,交替润湿和干燥被认为是“易于使用”。答复者认为有害生物管理的所有组成部分技术、脱粒和收割的推荐做法“非常容易使用”。大多数受访者声称他们采用了所有关键关键检查,例如使用推荐品种的优质种子,在最终平整后没有高低土壤斑点。同步种植的做法能够有效地利用灌溉,最大限度地减少病虫害在农场地区的传播,"确保有足够的健康幼苗","确保从分蘖到穗早期形成和开花的足够营养"。确保足够的水供应是基于农田距离灌溉水源的远近。没有因虫害而造成的重大产量损失,并在适当的时候切断和脱粒作物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信