Explaining university student loyalty: theory, method, and empirical research in Chile

J. A. Gallegos, A. Vasquez
{"title":"Explaining university student loyalty: theory, method, and empirical research in Chile","authors":"J. A. Gallegos, A. Vasquez","doi":"10.1108/arla-02-2019-0049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this paper is to explain student loyalty beyond its customary relationship with student satisfaction by including two relational variables, trust and commitment, two cognitive traits (service familiarity and communication) and one affective trait (opportunism) as moderators of the impact of trust and commitment on loyalty.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nTwo relational constructs (trust and commitment) are employed to improve the loyalty model and key comparisons are performed to know if career, cohort and sourcing school generate differences in the explanation of student loyalty.\n\n\nFindings\nResults show that the explanation chain that starts with student satisfaction but continues with the development of student trust and the reaching of student commitment culminates with student loyalty. The moderators (student opportunism, service familiarity, communication, age and available income for education) significantly contribute to the explanatory power of the model. Career is a meaningful differentiator in reaching student loyalty as are student cohort and the type of high school from which the student came.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThis is one of first empirical studies on university student loyalty. Future research could test the same or new hypotheses using different samples and contexts.\n\n\nPractical implications\nUniversity policies may benefit from the inclusion of norms regarding relational processes and outcomes such as the value of trust in the interactions and systematic recognition and awards assigned to student commitment achievements.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe explanation chain of customer loyalty was successfully applied to student loyalty, and strengthened with the addition of meaningful moderating variables.\n","PeriodicalId":387315,"journal":{"name":"Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración","volume":"97 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/arla-02-2019-0049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explain student loyalty beyond its customary relationship with student satisfaction by including two relational variables, trust and commitment, two cognitive traits (service familiarity and communication) and one affective trait (opportunism) as moderators of the impact of trust and commitment on loyalty. Design/methodology/approach Two relational constructs (trust and commitment) are employed to improve the loyalty model and key comparisons are performed to know if career, cohort and sourcing school generate differences in the explanation of student loyalty. Findings Results show that the explanation chain that starts with student satisfaction but continues with the development of student trust and the reaching of student commitment culminates with student loyalty. The moderators (student opportunism, service familiarity, communication, age and available income for education) significantly contribute to the explanatory power of the model. Career is a meaningful differentiator in reaching student loyalty as are student cohort and the type of high school from which the student came. Research limitations/implications This is one of first empirical studies on university student loyalty. Future research could test the same or new hypotheses using different samples and contexts. Practical implications University policies may benefit from the inclusion of norms regarding relational processes and outcomes such as the value of trust in the interactions and systematic recognition and awards assigned to student commitment achievements. Originality/value The explanation chain of customer loyalty was successfully applied to student loyalty, and strengthened with the addition of meaningful moderating variables.
解释智利大学生忠诚:理论、方法与实证研究
目的通过引入信任和承诺两个关系变量、两个认知特征(服务熟悉度和沟通度)和一个情感特征(机会主义)作为信任和承诺对忠诚影响的调节因子,来解释学生忠诚与学生满意度之间超越习惯关系的关系。设计/方法/方法采用两个关系结构(信任和承诺)来改进忠诚模型,并进行关键比较,以了解职业,队列和采购学校是否在解释学生忠诚方面产生差异。研究结果表明,该解释链从学生满意度开始,随着学生信任的发展而持续,学生承诺的达到以学生忠诚为高潮。调节因子(学生机会主义、服务熟悉度、沟通、年龄和教育可用收入)对模型的解释力有显著贡献。职业是影响学生忠诚度的一个有意义的因素,学生群体和学生来自的高中类型也是如此。研究局限/启示这是对大学生忠诚度的初步实证研究之一。未来的研究可以使用不同的样本和背景来测试相同或新的假设。实际意义大学政策可能受益于包含有关关系过程和结果的规范,例如互动中的信任价值和对学生承诺成就的系统认可和奖励。独创性/价值将顾客忠诚的解释链成功应用于学生忠诚,并通过加入有意义的调节变量而得到强化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信