American Public Opinion and Partisan Conflict: Education’s Exceptionalism?

R. Y. Shapiro, Anja Kilibarda, S. Sinozich, Oliver A. McClellan
{"title":"American Public Opinion and Partisan Conflict: Education’s Exceptionalism?","authors":"R. Y. Shapiro, Anja Kilibarda, S. Sinozich, Oliver A. McClellan","doi":"10.7551/mitpress/13712.003.0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The increase in partisan conflict in American politics in recent years has been stunning. It has been tracked and debated by political scientists at great length beginning with changes in elite level conflict in the two major American parties. This conflict has penetrated to the level of mass opinion and has become so pervasive that it is important to ask: what issues have not been substantially affected—and have thus been exceptional in this respect? Specifically, to what extent has education been one of them? Is this an issue around which there could be more constructive bipartisan debate and action than for other issues? Or does education policy divide partisans as much or more as do other issues? Analysis of national survey data indicates that the dimensions of education policy related to government spending and social values continue to be entangled in ongoing partisan and ideological conflict, though less strongly than for other national issues. Other dimensions – concerning the availability of quality education, educational standards, and accountability in elementary and secondary schooling— cannot be discussed in purely partisan terms. The emphasis on them has increased noticeably in national politics. While this has made education—and especially implementation during the Obama administration—no less a contentious issue at all levels, policy in this area has become potentially more open to constructive bipartisan policymaking. (ShapiroKilibardaSinozichPOEducation012116)","PeriodicalId":236193,"journal":{"name":"Public Opinion and the Political Economy of Education Policy around the World","volume":"392 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Opinion and the Political Economy of Education Policy around the World","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/13712.003.0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The increase in partisan conflict in American politics in recent years has been stunning. It has been tracked and debated by political scientists at great length beginning with changes in elite level conflict in the two major American parties. This conflict has penetrated to the level of mass opinion and has become so pervasive that it is important to ask: what issues have not been substantially affected—and have thus been exceptional in this respect? Specifically, to what extent has education been one of them? Is this an issue around which there could be more constructive bipartisan debate and action than for other issues? Or does education policy divide partisans as much or more as do other issues? Analysis of national survey data indicates that the dimensions of education policy related to government spending and social values continue to be entangled in ongoing partisan and ideological conflict, though less strongly than for other national issues. Other dimensions – concerning the availability of quality education, educational standards, and accountability in elementary and secondary schooling— cannot be discussed in purely partisan terms. The emphasis on them has increased noticeably in national politics. While this has made education—and especially implementation during the Obama administration—no less a contentious issue at all levels, policy in this area has become potentially more open to constructive bipartisan policymaking. (ShapiroKilibardaSinozichPOEducation012116)
美国舆论与党派冲突:教育的例外论?
近年来,美国政治中党派冲突的增加令人震惊。从美国两大政党精英阶层冲突的变化开始,政治学家对这一问题进行了详尽的追踪和辩论。这种冲突已经渗透到大众舆论的层面,并且变得如此普遍,以至于有必要问:哪些问题没有受到实质性的影响,因此在这方面是例外的?具体来说,教育在多大程度上是其中之一?在这个问题上,两党是否可以展开比其他问题更有建设性的辩论和行动?或者,教育政策是否会像其他问题一样让党派产生分歧?对全国调查数据的分析表明,与政府支出和社会价值观相关的教育政策的各个方面继续与持续的党派和意识形态冲突纠缠在一起,尽管没有其他国家问题那么强烈。其他方面- -关于提供优质教育、教育标准和小学和中学教育的责任- -不能纯粹以党派的方式加以讨论。在国家政治中,对它们的重视明显增加。虽然这使得教育——尤其是奥巴马政府期间的教育实施——在各个层面上都是一个有争议的问题,但这一领域的政策已经变得更加开放,可以进行建设性的两党政策制定。(ShapiroKilibardaSinozichPOEducation012116)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信