A logical view of types

P. Hayes, G. Hendrix
{"title":"A logical view of types","authors":"P. Hayes, G. Hendrix","doi":"10.1145/800227.806897","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"People working in the areas of data abstraction, databases, and conceptual modeling have argued at considerable length over the meanings of such terms as “abstraction” and “type.”* Rather than add to this debate by offering yet another set of definitions, in the paragraphs below we shall attempt to show how ordinary predicate calculus can be used to talk about most (perhaps all) the notions for which the terms “abstraction” and “type” are currently being used in various quarters of computer science. We do not intend to argue that predicate calculus is a suitable tool for implementing types, but rather that it provides a well-understood, uniform conceptual framework and notation for describing and precisely comparing various ideas on typing—and that special notations developed for this purpose are therefore unnecessary.","PeriodicalId":347815,"journal":{"name":"Workshop on Data Abstraction, Databases and Conceptual Modelling","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1981-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Workshop on Data Abstraction, Databases and Conceptual Modelling","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/800227.806897","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

People working in the areas of data abstraction, databases, and conceptual modeling have argued at considerable length over the meanings of such terms as “abstraction” and “type.”* Rather than add to this debate by offering yet another set of definitions, in the paragraphs below we shall attempt to show how ordinary predicate calculus can be used to talk about most (perhaps all) the notions for which the terms “abstraction” and “type” are currently being used in various quarters of computer science. We do not intend to argue that predicate calculus is a suitable tool for implementing types, but rather that it provides a well-understood, uniform conceptual framework and notation for describing and precisely comparing various ideas on typing—and that special notations developed for this purpose are therefore unnecessary.
类型的逻辑视图
数据抽象、数据库和概念建模领域的工作人员对“抽象”和“类型”等术语的含义进行了相当长的争论。*与其通过提供另一组定义来增加争论,在下面的段落中,我们将尝试展示如何使用普通谓词演算来讨论术语“抽象”和“类型”目前在计算机科学的各个领域中使用的大多数(也许是所有)概念。我们并不打算论证谓词演算是实现类型的合适工具,而是认为它提供了一个易于理解的、统一的概念框架和符号,用于描述和精确比较关于类型的各种想法——因此,为此目的开发的特殊符号是不必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信