Evaluating Machine Learning Techniques on Human Activity Recognition Using Accelerometer Data

R. Khan, M. Abbas, Rubia Anjum, Fatima Waheed, Sheeraz Ahmed, F. Bangash
{"title":"Evaluating Machine Learning Techniques on Human Activity Recognition Using Accelerometer Data","authors":"R. Khan, M. Abbas, Rubia Anjum, Fatima Waheed, Sheeraz Ahmed, F. Bangash","doi":"10.1109/UCET51115.2020.9205376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Human activity recognition is gaining increasing importance because of its implication in remote monitoring application including security, health and fitness apps. This paper provides an analysis of different machine learning techniques for recognizing human activity. Firstly, all the recent work related to human activity recognition using accelerometer data is analyzed and presented in the paper. In this study the accelerometer used in smartphones as well as those embedded in wearable devices are compared and recognition methodologies applied on both the devices are presented. The dataset used in this project is a transformed version of \"Activity Recognition using Cell Phone Accelerometers,\" by the Wireless Sensor Data Mining WSDM. Some important features were extracted from the data and based on it different models were assessed using Matlab Classification Learner App. Four distinct machine learning techniques were applied on the dataset, namely, linear regression, logistic regression, support vector machine and neural network. For the purposed of applying classifier Weka tool is used. The results of these algorithms are compared and presented in the form of tables and graphs and Bagged Tree is identified to be the best algorithm based on accuracy results.","PeriodicalId":163493,"journal":{"name":"2020 International Conference on UK-China Emerging Technologies (UCET)","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 International Conference on UK-China Emerging Technologies (UCET)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/UCET51115.2020.9205376","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Human activity recognition is gaining increasing importance because of its implication in remote monitoring application including security, health and fitness apps. This paper provides an analysis of different machine learning techniques for recognizing human activity. Firstly, all the recent work related to human activity recognition using accelerometer data is analyzed and presented in the paper. In this study the accelerometer used in smartphones as well as those embedded in wearable devices are compared and recognition methodologies applied on both the devices are presented. The dataset used in this project is a transformed version of "Activity Recognition using Cell Phone Accelerometers," by the Wireless Sensor Data Mining WSDM. Some important features were extracted from the data and based on it different models were assessed using Matlab Classification Learner App. Four distinct machine learning techniques were applied on the dataset, namely, linear regression, logistic regression, support vector machine and neural network. For the purposed of applying classifier Weka tool is used. The results of these algorithms are compared and presented in the form of tables and graphs and Bagged Tree is identified to be the best algorithm based on accuracy results.
利用加速度计数据评估机器学习技术在人类活动识别中的应用
由于人体活动识别在安全、健康和健身应用等远程监控应用中具有重要意义,因此它变得越来越重要。本文分析了用于识别人类活动的不同机器学习技术。本文首先对近年来利用加速度计数据进行人体活动识别的相关工作进行了分析和介绍。在本研究中,比较了智能手机中使用的加速度计以及嵌入可穿戴设备中的加速度计,并介绍了两种设备上应用的识别方法。本项目中使用的数据集是由无线传感器数据挖掘WSDM提供的“使用手机加速度计的活动识别”的转换版本。从数据中提取一些重要特征,并在此基础上使用Matlab Classification Learner App评估不同的模型。在数据集上应用了四种不同的机器学习技术,即线性回归、逻辑回归、支持向量机和神经网络。为了应用分类器,使用了Weka工具。将这些算法的结果以表格和图表的形式进行比较,并根据准确率结果确定Bagged Tree是最佳算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信