Looking ahead - from fossil fuel to a circular bioeconomy in Europe. Evolution and behaviour

Gheorghe Zaman, G. Grădinaru, Bogdan Florin Matei
{"title":"Looking ahead - from fossil fuel to a circular bioeconomy in Europe. Evolution and behaviour","authors":"Gheorghe Zaman, G. Grădinaru, Bogdan Florin Matei","doi":"10.2478/icas-2021-0022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Giving due consideration to sustainability, the new concept of bioeconomy has faced strong support from international policymakers, changing the way the economy is currently working. And it does not involve only the replacement of fossil feedstock with bio-based fuels, but also acquiring value from waste and bringing to light the resource efficiency that can lead to a smooth transition from a linear to a circular economy. This paper aims to track the EU states movement in implementing the bioeconomy best practices by building clusters based on their progress in adapting their industries to the new requirements. To make this possible, we created two scenarios for recording the evolution of the energy industry in 27 countries: the first one that groups them according to the fossil-fuel sources, and the second one based on renewable resources. Our results revealed that the biomass tends to be used as a complementary source and not a substitute, in comparison to the traditional fuels. Same actors keep the leading positions in both scenarios, making us believe that they may face strong challenges in reaching the European Commission goals. Thus, the present study emphasizes the need to develop highly efficient policies for all EU members to keep the same path.","PeriodicalId":393626,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Applied Statistics","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Applied Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/icas-2021-0022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Giving due consideration to sustainability, the new concept of bioeconomy has faced strong support from international policymakers, changing the way the economy is currently working. And it does not involve only the replacement of fossil feedstock with bio-based fuels, but also acquiring value from waste and bringing to light the resource efficiency that can lead to a smooth transition from a linear to a circular economy. This paper aims to track the EU states movement in implementing the bioeconomy best practices by building clusters based on their progress in adapting their industries to the new requirements. To make this possible, we created two scenarios for recording the evolution of the energy industry in 27 countries: the first one that groups them according to the fossil-fuel sources, and the second one based on renewable resources. Our results revealed that the biomass tends to be used as a complementary source and not a substitute, in comparison to the traditional fuels. Same actors keep the leading positions in both scenarios, making us believe that they may face strong challenges in reaching the European Commission goals. Thus, the present study emphasizes the need to develop highly efficient policies for all EU members to keep the same path.
展望未来——从化石燃料到欧洲的循环生物经济。进化与行为
由于考虑到可持续性,生物经济的新概念得到了国际政策制定者的大力支持,改变了当前经济的运行方式。它不仅涉及用生物燃料替代化石原料,而且还涉及从废物中获取价值,并揭示资源效率,从而实现从线性经济向循环经济的平稳过渡。本文旨在跟踪欧盟国家在实施生物经济最佳实践方面的行动,通过建立基于其产业适应新要求的进展的集群。为了实现这一点,我们创建了两个场景来记录27个国家能源工业的发展:第一个是根据化石燃料来源进行分组的,第二个是基于可再生资源的。我们的研究结果表明,与传统燃料相比,生物质倾向于作为一种补充来源,而不是替代品。在这两种情况下,同样的参与者保持领先地位,这使我们相信,他们在实现欧盟委员会的目标方面可能面临巨大挑战。因此,本研究强调需要为所有欧盟成员国制定高效的政策,以保持相同的道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信