AMBIGUITY IN ISLAMIC LEGAL HERMENEUTICS AND ITS IMPACT ON JURISTIC DIFFERENCES: AN ISLAMIC LEGAL THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVE

مجلة الجامعة القاسمية للعلوم الشرعية والدراسات الإسلامية Pub Date : 2022-06-22 DOI:10.52747/aqujssis.2.01.115

Mohamamd Alrahawan

{"title":"AMBIGUITY IN ISLAMIC LEGAL HERMENEUTICS AND ITS IMPACT ON JURISTIC DIFFERENCES: AN ISLAMIC LEGAL THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVE","authors":"Mohamamd Alrahawan","doi":"10.52747/aqujssis.2.01.115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Islamic legal hermeneutics can be identified in the writings of Muslim legal theorists. It focuses on the principles of interpreting the language of the Lawgiver for devising legal rulings on practical questions and how a language can govern a law. This paper attempts to show how ambiguity of religious texts affect legal determinations of juristic issues and to reveal the usuli approach of resolving religious ambiguous texts. It further aims at measuring whether Islamic legal theory was consistent with legal rulings derived by the Muslim jurisprudents. However, ambiguity is discussed on the level of the meaning of individual words and structures. This falls within the realm of equivocality and the interpretation of imperative forms. Though those principles were designed to show consistency between theory and practice, the outcomes were not ideal in the literal sense of the word. Legal theoretical precepts are probability maxims which are comprehensively applicable to all particulars","PeriodicalId":375030,"journal":{"name":"مجلة الجامعة القاسمية للعلوم الشرعية والدراسات الإسلامية","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"مجلة الجامعة القاسمية للعلوم الشرعية والدراسات الإسلامية","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52747/aqujssis.2.01.115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Islamic legal hermeneutics can be identified in the writings of Muslim legal theorists. It focuses on the principles of interpreting the language of the Lawgiver for devising legal rulings on practical questions and how a language can govern a law. This paper attempts to show how ambiguity of religious texts affect legal determinations of juristic issues and to reveal the usuli approach of resolving religious ambiguous texts. It further aims at measuring whether Islamic legal theory was consistent with legal rulings derived by the Muslim jurisprudents. However, ambiguity is discussed on the level of the meaning of individual words and structures. This falls within the realm of equivocality and the interpretation of imperative forms. Though those principles were designed to show consistency between theory and practice, the outcomes were not ideal in the literal sense of the word. Legal theoretical precepts are probability maxims which are comprehensively applicable to all particulars

查看原文本刊更多论文

伊斯兰法律解释学中的歧义及其对法律差异的影响:一个伊斯兰法律理论的视角

伊斯兰法律解释学可以在穆斯林法律理论家的著作中找到。它侧重于解释立法者的语言原则，以便就实际问题制定法律裁决，以及语言如何支配法律。本文试图说明宗教文本的歧义如何影响法律问题的法律确定，并揭示解决宗教文本歧义的通常方法。它进一步旨在衡量伊斯兰法律理论是否与穆斯林法学家得出的法律裁决相一致。然而，歧义是在单个词和结构的意义层面上讨论的。这属于模棱两可和祈使句解释的范畴。虽然这些原则旨在表明理论与实践之间的一致性，但从字面意义上讲，结果并不理想。法律理论规范是概率性准则，是全面适用于所有事项的准则

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

مجلة الجامعة القاسمية للعلوم الشرعية والدراسات الإسلامية

自引率

0.00%

发文量