First-Year Undergraduate Student Expectations of two UK Chemistry Degree Programmes

Dylan P. Williams, Shane Lo Fan Hin, E. Erlina
{"title":"First-Year Undergraduate Student Expectations of two UK Chemistry Degree Programmes","authors":"Dylan P. Williams, Shane Lo Fan Hin, E. Erlina","doi":"10.29311/NDTPS.V0I14.3047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent work on student perceptions of skills development and engagement with different teaching and learning approaches have provided useful evidence bases for practitioners aiming to enhance the student learning experience. Although there has been some useful research on student expectations in non-STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) disciplines, there remains an opportunity to measure and analyse the expectations of students in STEM disciplines, particularly chemistry. The aim of this study was to measure the expectations that first year undergraduate chemists have of the types of learning experiences that will be included in their degree programmes, the amount of time per week that they will devote to different aspects of study and the types of learning behaviours they will adopt. Data was collected using questionnaires deployed at the Universities of Leicester and Sussex in the 2017/18 academic year. The study has shown that many students overestimate the amount of lecture based (59%) and small group based (57%) contact time they expect to have. Students appear to place a high value on the importance of feedback in the learning process but the proportion of students who agree they will read and act on feedback decreases over the course of the academic year. A number of factors feed into student reflections on the difference between expectation and reality including the quality of student life (e.g. quality of accommodation and social activities), value-for-money concerns (e.g. the amount of contact time and the quality of teaching) and matters related to workload and learning support.","PeriodicalId":174795,"journal":{"name":"New directions in the teaching of physical sciences","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New directions in the teaching of physical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29311/NDTPS.V0I14.3047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Recent work on student perceptions of skills development and engagement with different teaching and learning approaches have provided useful evidence bases for practitioners aiming to enhance the student learning experience. Although there has been some useful research on student expectations in non-STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) disciplines, there remains an opportunity to measure and analyse the expectations of students in STEM disciplines, particularly chemistry. The aim of this study was to measure the expectations that first year undergraduate chemists have of the types of learning experiences that will be included in their degree programmes, the amount of time per week that they will devote to different aspects of study and the types of learning behaviours they will adopt. Data was collected using questionnaires deployed at the Universities of Leicester and Sussex in the 2017/18 academic year. The study has shown that many students overestimate the amount of lecture based (59%) and small group based (57%) contact time they expect to have. Students appear to place a high value on the importance of feedback in the learning process but the proportion of students who agree they will read and act on feedback decreases over the course of the academic year. A number of factors feed into student reflections on the difference between expectation and reality including the quality of student life (e.g. quality of accommodation and social activities), value-for-money concerns (e.g. the amount of contact time and the quality of teaching) and matters related to workload and learning support.
两个英国化学学位课程的第一年本科学生期望
最近关于学生对技能发展的看法和对不同教学方法的参与的研究为旨在提高学生学习体验的实践者提供了有用的证据基础。尽管对非STEM(科学、技术、工程和数学)学科的学生期望进行了一些有用的研究,但仍然有机会衡量和分析STEM学科(特别是化学)学生的期望。本研究的目的是衡量一年级本科化学家对将纳入其学位课程的学习经历类型的期望,他们每周将投入不同学习方面的时间以及他们将采用的学习行为类型。数据是通过2017/18学年在莱斯特大学和苏塞克斯大学部署的问卷收集的。研究表明,许多学生高估了他们期望的以讲座为基础的接触时间(59%)和以小组为基础的接触时间(57%)。学生们似乎很重视学习过程中反馈的重要性,但同意他们会阅读并根据反馈采取行动的学生比例在整个学年中都在下降。学生反映期望与现实之间的差异的因素有很多,包括学生生活的质量(例如住宿和社交活动的质量)、物有所值的问题(例如接触时间的多少和教学质量)以及与工作量和学习支持有关的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信