Corporate Governance Challenges in Initial Coin Offerings

Aurelio Gurrea-Martínez, Nydia Remolina
{"title":"Corporate Governance Challenges in Initial Coin Offerings","authors":"Aurelio Gurrea-Martínez, Nydia Remolina","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3697099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the past years, Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs) have become an important fundraising method for many individuals and firms. While most regulators, academics and policymakers around the world have focused their attention on whether and, if so, when ICOs are subject to securities laws, they have overlooked many other legal issues involved in an ICO. This article seeks to partially fill this gap by analysing the corporate governance challenges arising in an ICO. Namely, it will explore the exacerbated agency problems existing between the issuers and buyers of tokens, and why traditional corporate governance mechanisms fail to protect tokenholders. Therefore, new strategies must be implemented to protect tokenholders from the opportunism of entrepreneurs launching an ICO. Based on a functional and comparative analysis of ICOs, with particular emphasis on the regulatory responses generally provided in Asia, Europe, the United Kingdom, and the United States, this chapter highlights the corporate governance problems arising in ICOs. It will conclude with various policy recommendations that, by enhancing the level of protection of tokenholders and creating more certainty to entrepreneurs, seek to improve the attractiveness of ICOs as a fundraising method for individuals and firms while reducing the risk of opportunism of promoters vis-a-vis tokenholders.","PeriodicalId":114900,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Corporate Governance International (Topic)","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Corporate Governance International (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3697099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

In the past years, Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs) have become an important fundraising method for many individuals and firms. While most regulators, academics and policymakers around the world have focused their attention on whether and, if so, when ICOs are subject to securities laws, they have overlooked many other legal issues involved in an ICO. This article seeks to partially fill this gap by analysing the corporate governance challenges arising in an ICO. Namely, it will explore the exacerbated agency problems existing between the issuers and buyers of tokens, and why traditional corporate governance mechanisms fail to protect tokenholders. Therefore, new strategies must be implemented to protect tokenholders from the opportunism of entrepreneurs launching an ICO. Based on a functional and comparative analysis of ICOs, with particular emphasis on the regulatory responses generally provided in Asia, Europe, the United Kingdom, and the United States, this chapter highlights the corporate governance problems arising in ICOs. It will conclude with various policy recommendations that, by enhancing the level of protection of tokenholders and creating more certainty to entrepreneurs, seek to improve the attractiveness of ICOs as a fundraising method for individuals and firms while reducing the risk of opportunism of promoters vis-a-vis tokenholders.
首次代币发行中的公司治理挑战
在过去的几年里,首次代币发行(ico)已经成为许多个人和公司的重要融资方式。虽然世界各地的大多数监管机构、学者和政策制定者都把注意力集中在ICO是否以及如果是的话,何时受证券法的约束上,但他们忽视了ICO涉及的许多其他法律问题。本文试图通过分析ICO中出现的公司治理挑战来部分填补这一空白。也就是说,它将探讨代币发行者和购买者之间存在的加剧的代理问题,以及为什么传统的公司治理机制无法保护代币持有人。因此,必须实施新的策略,以保护代币持有人免受启动ICO的企业家的机会主义。基于对ico的功能和比较分析,特别强调亚洲、欧洲、英国和美国通常提供的监管回应,本章强调了ico中出现的公司治理问题。最后,它将提出各种政策建议,通过提高对代币持有者的保护水平和为企业家创造更多的确定性,寻求提高ico作为个人和公司融资方式的吸引力,同时降低发起人对代币持有者的机会主义风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信