{"title":"Time and Space: Barthes and the Discourse of History","authors":"M. O’sullivan","doi":"10.5871/bacad/9780197266670.003.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Roland Barthes’s ‘Michelet, l’histoire et la mort’ (1951), Michelet’s linear journey through centuries of French history is contrasted with the panoramic ‘tableau’ that holds together, in a moment of euphoric understanding, otherwise unconnected points in time. This chapter moves from this play of reversible and irreversible time to that of centred and decentred spaces in an unpublished section of Barthes’s 1966–7 seminar, ‘Le discours de l’histoire’. It suggests that Barthes’s discussion of time and space, which draws on the work of Vernant, Levêque, and Vidal-Naquet, and is applied to Michelet, Machiavelli, and Bossuet, can be mapped onto a shift from a structuralist focus on intra-relations between elements of a structure (as in Lévi-Strauss’s account of totemism) to the nascent post-structuralist emphasis on excentric structures associated with Derrida’s notion of ‘play’. The excentric centre is shown to underpin Barthes’s analysis of Michelet’s Tableau de la France, whereby Jakobson’s account of the poetic function of language is applied to Michelet’s rhetorical construction of the geography of France: the sequential ordering of the outlying regions according to their antithetical characteristics is ‘poetic’ in its form; by contrast, the ‘prosaic’ centre (the Île de France) absorbs and neutralises these differences.","PeriodicalId":396873,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary Barthes","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary Barthes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5871/bacad/9780197266670.003.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
In Roland Barthes’s ‘Michelet, l’histoire et la mort’ (1951), Michelet’s linear journey through centuries of French history is contrasted with the panoramic ‘tableau’ that holds together, in a moment of euphoric understanding, otherwise unconnected points in time. This chapter moves from this play of reversible and irreversible time to that of centred and decentred spaces in an unpublished section of Barthes’s 1966–7 seminar, ‘Le discours de l’histoire’. It suggests that Barthes’s discussion of time and space, which draws on the work of Vernant, Levêque, and Vidal-Naquet, and is applied to Michelet, Machiavelli, and Bossuet, can be mapped onto a shift from a structuralist focus on intra-relations between elements of a structure (as in Lévi-Strauss’s account of totemism) to the nascent post-structuralist emphasis on excentric structures associated with Derrida’s notion of ‘play’. The excentric centre is shown to underpin Barthes’s analysis of Michelet’s Tableau de la France, whereby Jakobson’s account of the poetic function of language is applied to Michelet’s rhetorical construction of the geography of France: the sequential ordering of the outlying regions according to their antithetical characteristics is ‘poetic’ in its form; by contrast, the ‘prosaic’ centre (the Île de France) absorbs and neutralises these differences.
在罗兰·巴特(Roland Barthes)的《米歇莱,l ' histoire et la mort》(1951)中,米歇莱穿越几个世纪的法国历史的线性旅程与全景的“画面”形成对比,在一个令人愉悦的理解时刻,否则是不相关的时间点。本章从这个可逆和不可逆的时间的戏剧转移到巴特1966-7年研讨会的一个未发表的部分,“Le diss de l ' histoire”。这表明巴特对时间和空间的讨论,借鉴了Vernant, Levêque和Vidal-Naquet的工作,并应用于Michelet, Machiavelli和Bossuet,可以映射为一种转变,从结构主义者关注结构元素之间的内部关系(如在lsamvii - strauss对图腾主义的描述中)到新生的后结构主义者强调与德里达的“游戏”概念相关的外中心结构。中心中心是巴特对米舍莱的《法国表》的分析的基础,雅各布森对语言的诗意功能的描述被应用于米舍莱对法国地理的修辞结构:根据其对立特征对外围地区的顺序排序在其形式上是“诗意的”;相比之下,“平淡”的中心(Île de France)吸收并中和了这些差异。