Neutronic Methodological Benchmarks With Simplified Geometries for the Gas Cooled Reactor Group Constant Generating Tools

E. Temesvári, B. Batki, M. Gren
{"title":"Neutronic Methodological Benchmarks With Simplified Geometries for the Gas Cooled Reactor Group Constant Generating Tools","authors":"E. Temesvári, B. Batki, M. Gren","doi":"10.1115/ICONE26-81427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the ESNII+ EU FP7 project, a reactor physics benchmark aiming at the whole core calculation with the reflectors and detailed description of the structural elements was specified. This benchmark is based on the 2009 CEA concept of the ALLEGRO core. Fixed nominal technological data at nominal reactor state (geometry, composition) were prescribed which had to be modified in specified calculation branches according to different types of the thermal expansion and control rod positions. The parameters of the point kinetic model to be applied in a system thermal hydraulic code had to be determined this way. Static mechanical models of the expansion processes were specified by the benchmark.\n The goal of the calculation exercise was to verify the reactor physics codes, namely to get information about the modelling uncertainties and — after — their influence on the calculated results of the safety analyses. The obtained deviations between the participants are characterizing the user effects, the modelling uncertainties and the influence of the nuclear data differences all, without the possibility of their separation because of the complexity of the benchmark problem. A conclusion could be drawn that a step by step procedure starting from simple problems (homogenous material, Wigner-Seitz cell or subassembly in asymptotic approach) is necessary if we wish to identify the reasons of the deviations. For the Doppler effect, a decision was made in this direction already in the ESNII+ project where an infinite regular lattice problem without any leakage had to be solved. This approach of the simplicity is followed by the present benchmarks (one rod and one assembly), but extending the simple benchmarks with burnup calculations and taking into account leakage in asymptotic approximation by neglecting the complicated processes necessary in the reflector regions.","PeriodicalId":354697,"journal":{"name":"Volume 5: Advanced Reactors and Fusion Technologies; Codes, Standards, Licensing, and Regulatory Issues","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 5: Advanced Reactors and Fusion Technologies; Codes, Standards, Licensing, and Regulatory Issues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/ICONE26-81427","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the ESNII+ EU FP7 project, a reactor physics benchmark aiming at the whole core calculation with the reflectors and detailed description of the structural elements was specified. This benchmark is based on the 2009 CEA concept of the ALLEGRO core. Fixed nominal technological data at nominal reactor state (geometry, composition) were prescribed which had to be modified in specified calculation branches according to different types of the thermal expansion and control rod positions. The parameters of the point kinetic model to be applied in a system thermal hydraulic code had to be determined this way. Static mechanical models of the expansion processes were specified by the benchmark. The goal of the calculation exercise was to verify the reactor physics codes, namely to get information about the modelling uncertainties and — after — their influence on the calculated results of the safety analyses. The obtained deviations between the participants are characterizing the user effects, the modelling uncertainties and the influence of the nuclear data differences all, without the possibility of their separation because of the complexity of the benchmark problem. A conclusion could be drawn that a step by step procedure starting from simple problems (homogenous material, Wigner-Seitz cell or subassembly in asymptotic approach) is necessary if we wish to identify the reasons of the deviations. For the Doppler effect, a decision was made in this direction already in the ESNII+ project where an infinite regular lattice problem without any leakage had to be solved. This approach of the simplicity is followed by the present benchmarks (one rod and one assembly), but extending the simple benchmarks with burnup calculations and taking into account leakage in asymptotic approximation by neglecting the complicated processes necessary in the reflector regions.
气冷堆组常数生成工具的简化几何中子方法基准
在ESNII+ EU FP7项目中,指定了一个针对整个堆芯计算的反应堆物理基准,包括反射器和结构元件的详细描述。这个基准是基于2009年CEA的ALLEGRO核心概念。规定了反应器标称状态(几何、组成)下的固定标称工艺数据,这些数据必须根据不同类型的热膨胀和控制棒位置在指定的计算分支中进行修改。应用于系统热工规范的点动力学模型的参数必须以这种方式确定。根据基准确定了膨胀过程的静态力学模型。计算练习的目的是验证反应堆物理代码,即获得有关建模不确定性及其对安全分析计算结果的影响的信息。获得的参与者之间的偏差描述了用户效应、建模不确定性和核数据差异的影响,由于基准问题的复杂性,它们不可能分离。可以得出结论,如果我们希望确定偏差的原因,就必须从简单问题(均质材料,Wigner-Seitz单元或渐近方法中的子装配)开始逐步进行程序。对于多普勒效应,ESNII+项目已经在这个方向上做出了决定,该项目需要解决无泄漏的无限规则晶格问题。这种简单的方法适用于目前的基准测试(一杆和一个组件),但将简单的基准测试扩展为燃耗计算,并通过忽略反射区域中必要的复杂过程来考虑渐近近似中的泄漏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信