A comparison of two methods for fountain-coded file distribution in an ad hoc network with relays

Siddhartha S. Borkotoky, M. Pursley
{"title":"A comparison of two methods for fountain-coded file distribution in an ad hoc network with relays","authors":"Siddhartha S. Borkotoky, M. Pursley","doi":"10.1109/ITA.2017.8023464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We investigate two approaches to fountain-coded broadcast file distribution in an ad hoc packet radio network. In the first method, all destinations receive fountain-coded packets directly from the source. In the second method, after one destination obtains the file, it acts as a relay node by applying continued fountain coding to the file and sending the encoded packets to other destinations. The other destinations combine the fountain-coded packets they received from the source with those they obtain from the relay node. We compare the performance of the two methods when they are employed in a network whose links have Rayleigh fading. As performance benchmarks, we also examine two conventional broadcast techniques that use automatic repeat request (ARQ) for retransmission of erased packets.","PeriodicalId":305510,"journal":{"name":"2017 Information Theory and Applications Workshop (ITA)","volume":"163 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 Information Theory and Applications Workshop (ITA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ITA.2017.8023464","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

We investigate two approaches to fountain-coded broadcast file distribution in an ad hoc packet radio network. In the first method, all destinations receive fountain-coded packets directly from the source. In the second method, after one destination obtains the file, it acts as a relay node by applying continued fountain coding to the file and sending the encoded packets to other destinations. The other destinations combine the fountain-coded packets they received from the source with those they obtain from the relay node. We compare the performance of the two methods when they are employed in a network whose links have Rayleigh fading. As performance benchmarks, we also examine two conventional broadcast techniques that use automatic repeat request (ARQ) for retransmission of erased packets.
在带中继的自组网中分发源编码文件的两种方法的比较
我们研究了在自组织分组无线网络中源编码广播文件分发的两种方法。在第一种方法中,所有目的地都直接从源接收源编码的数据包。在第二种方法中,在一个目的地获得文件后,它充当中继节点,对文件应用持续的喷泉编码,并将编码后的数据包发送到其他目的地。其他目的地将它们从源接收到的源编码数据包与从中继节点获得的数据包结合起来。我们比较了两种方法在链路存在瑞利衰落的网络中的性能。作为性能基准,我们还研究了两种传统的广播技术,它们使用自动重复请求(ARQ)来重传被擦除的数据包。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信