Endoscopic findings are not different in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding with COVID-19

F. Akın, Öykü Tayfur Yürekli, M. Tahtacı, O. Ersoy
{"title":"Endoscopic findings are not different in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding with COVID-19","authors":"F. Akın, Öykü Tayfur Yürekli, M. Tahtacı, O. Ersoy","doi":"10.17941/agd.1275659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Aims: Coronavirus disease-2019 is an emerging disease of global public health concern. We aimed to evaluate the demographic data, clinical properties, risk factors and endoscopy findings of coronavirus disease-2019 patients with upper gastrointestinal system bleeding. Materials and Method: Patients who underwent endoscopy for upper gastrointestinal bleeding between July 2, 2020 and January 29, 2021 and were diagnosed with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 confirmed by polymerase chain reaction were included in the study. In this retrospective study patients with gastrointestinal bleeding were compared as 1:2 case-control. Coronavirus disease-2019 patients who underwent endoscopy for upper gastrointestinal bleeding and the control group were compared retrospectively in terms of demographic data, comorbid diseases, bleeding symptom, drugs administered, laboratory parameters, time between bleeding symptom and endoscopy, endoscopy findings, gastrointestinal bleeding treatment, and mortality rates. Results: Forty Covid-19 patients (23 males, mean age ± SD, 65.92 ± 12.97) and 80 non-Covid-19 control patients (43 males, mean age ± SD, 66.17 ± 15.61) who underwent endoscopy for upper gastrointestinal bleeding were compared. The most common bleeding symptom was melena in both groups (50% vs 60%). Hospitalization in intensive care unit (47.5% vs 20%, P = 0.004) and need for mechanic ventilation (22.5% vs 5%, p = 0.006), use of corticosteroids were more common in coronavirus disease-2019 group (30% vs. 2.5%, p = 0.000). The need for erythrocyt replacement were not different between the groups [median (min - max) 1.5 (0 - 13) vs 0.5 (0 - 22), p = 0.397]. Use of low molecular weight heparin was statistically more common in coronavirus disease-2019 group (32.5% vs 5%, p=0.00). Time elapsed until the performance of endoscopy in terms of hours was significantly longer in coronavirus disease-2019 group (62.97 ± 84.59 vs. 21.85 ± 33.91, p = 0.006). The most common endoscopic finding was gastroduodenal ulcer in both groups. No significant differences were seen in terms of rebleeeding rates. Mortality rate was statistically higher in coronavirus disease-2019 group (37.5% vs 8.8%, p = 0.000). Conclusions: Until more precise guidelines for the management of gastrointestinal bleeding in COVID-19 patients are developed, a case-by-case decision should be made on whether to perform endoscopy and the timing of the procedure, after multidisciplinary assessments are made in terms of patient status, response to medical therapy, treatment resources, and assessment of risks.","PeriodicalId":118745,"journal":{"name":"Akademik Gastroenteroloji Dergisi","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Akademik Gastroenteroloji Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17941/agd.1275659","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aims: Coronavirus disease-2019 is an emerging disease of global public health concern. We aimed to evaluate the demographic data, clinical properties, risk factors and endoscopy findings of coronavirus disease-2019 patients with upper gastrointestinal system bleeding. Materials and Method: Patients who underwent endoscopy for upper gastrointestinal bleeding between July 2, 2020 and January 29, 2021 and were diagnosed with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 confirmed by polymerase chain reaction were included in the study. In this retrospective study patients with gastrointestinal bleeding were compared as 1:2 case-control. Coronavirus disease-2019 patients who underwent endoscopy for upper gastrointestinal bleeding and the control group were compared retrospectively in terms of demographic data, comorbid diseases, bleeding symptom, drugs administered, laboratory parameters, time between bleeding symptom and endoscopy, endoscopy findings, gastrointestinal bleeding treatment, and mortality rates. Results: Forty Covid-19 patients (23 males, mean age ± SD, 65.92 ± 12.97) and 80 non-Covid-19 control patients (43 males, mean age ± SD, 66.17 ± 15.61) who underwent endoscopy for upper gastrointestinal bleeding were compared. The most common bleeding symptom was melena in both groups (50% vs 60%). Hospitalization in intensive care unit (47.5% vs 20%, P = 0.004) and need for mechanic ventilation (22.5% vs 5%, p = 0.006), use of corticosteroids were more common in coronavirus disease-2019 group (30% vs. 2.5%, p = 0.000). The need for erythrocyt replacement were not different between the groups [median (min - max) 1.5 (0 - 13) vs 0.5 (0 - 22), p = 0.397]. Use of low molecular weight heparin was statistically more common in coronavirus disease-2019 group (32.5% vs 5%, p=0.00). Time elapsed until the performance of endoscopy in terms of hours was significantly longer in coronavirus disease-2019 group (62.97 ± 84.59 vs. 21.85 ± 33.91, p = 0.006). The most common endoscopic finding was gastroduodenal ulcer in both groups. No significant differences were seen in terms of rebleeeding rates. Mortality rate was statistically higher in coronavirus disease-2019 group (37.5% vs 8.8%, p = 0.000). Conclusions: Until more precise guidelines for the management of gastrointestinal bleeding in COVID-19 patients are developed, a case-by-case decision should be made on whether to perform endoscopy and the timing of the procedure, after multidisciplinary assessments are made in terms of patient status, response to medical therapy, treatment resources, and assessment of risks.
上消化道出血合并COVID-19患者的内镜检查结果无差异
背景与目的:冠状病毒病(2019)是一种引起全球公共卫生关注的新兴疾病。我们旨在评估冠状病毒病-2019上消化道出血患者的人口统计学资料、临床特征、危险因素和内镜检查结果。材料与方法:选取2020年7月2日至2021年1月29日期间因上消化道出血行内镜检查且经聚合酶链反应确诊为严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒-2的患者为研究对象。在本回顾性研究中,胃肠道出血患者以1:2的病例对照进行比较。回顾性比较冠状病毒病-2019上消化道出血内镜患者与对照组的人口学资料、合并症、出血症状、给药药物、实验室参数、出血症状与内镜检查时间、内镜检查结果、胃肠道出血治疗和死亡率。结果:40例新冠肺炎患者(男性23例,平均年龄±SD 65.92±12.97)与80例非新冠肺炎对照患者(男性43例,平均年龄±SD 66.17±15.61)行上消化道出血内镜检查。两组中最常见的出血症状是黑痘(50% vs 60%)。重症监护病房住院(47.5%对20%,P = 0.004)、机械通气需求(22.5%对5%,P = 0.006)、皮质类固醇的使用在冠状病毒病-2019组中更为常见(30%对2.5%,P = 0.000)。两组间红细胞替代需求无差异[中位数(最小-最大)1.5 (0 - 13)vs 0.5 (0 - 22), p = 0.397]。在冠状病毒病-2019组中,低分子肝素的使用在统计学上更为常见(32.5%比5%,p=0.00)。冠状病毒病-2019组内镜检查时间(62.97±84.59∶21.85±33.91,p = 0.006)明显延长。两组中最常见的内镜发现是胃十二指肠溃疡。再出血率方面没有明显差异。冠状病毒病-2019组死亡率更高(37.5% vs 8.8%, p = 0.000)。结论:在制定更精确的COVID-19患者胃肠道出血管理指南之前,应在对患者状况、药物治疗反应、治疗资源和风险评估等进行多学科评估后,根据具体情况决定是否进行内窥镜检查和手术时机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信