New Drugs to Tackle Antimicrobial Resistance: Analysis of EU Policy Options

Priya Sharma, A. Towse
{"title":"New Drugs to Tackle Antimicrobial Resistance: Analysis of EU Policy Options","authors":"Priya Sharma, A. Towse","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2640028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is becoming a major global public health threat, contributing to the growing problem of drug resistance, a naturally occurring consequence of treating infectious diseases with drugs. Recently, AMR has begun to command attention from European policy makers whose focus has moved towards addressing the lack of new drugs in the R&D pipeline of the pharmaceutical industry.In 2009 the EU focused on the need for the development of new antibacterials to fill the pipeline and the need for the introduction of appropriate incentives to stimulate R&D for novel antibiotics. A Report commissioned from the London School of Economics (LSE) examined appropriate ways to stimulate the development of new antibiotics. Its findings, and other material were discussed at a conference in Stockholm in September 2009.The purpose of this paper is to contribute to the discussion that began in Stockholm by presenting policy makers and other relevant stakeholders with a short list of feasible and realistic solutions for Europe to stimulate R&D by attempting to determine the size of the various incentives needed to make the net present value (NPV) for antibiotic development more competitive relative to other therapeutic classes. To do this we selected incentives that have been implemented or discussed in regards to addressing disincentives and market failures in other markets: neglected diseases, orphan drugs, countermeasures against chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear (CBRN) agents, and evidence for paediatric drug use.","PeriodicalId":128340,"journal":{"name":"PharmSciRN: Pharmaceutical Intellectual Property Protection (Topic)","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"45","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PharmSciRN: Pharmaceutical Intellectual Property Protection (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2640028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 45

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is becoming a major global public health threat, contributing to the growing problem of drug resistance, a naturally occurring consequence of treating infectious diseases with drugs. Recently, AMR has begun to command attention from European policy makers whose focus has moved towards addressing the lack of new drugs in the R&D pipeline of the pharmaceutical industry.In 2009 the EU focused on the need for the development of new antibacterials to fill the pipeline and the need for the introduction of appropriate incentives to stimulate R&D for novel antibiotics. A Report commissioned from the London School of Economics (LSE) examined appropriate ways to stimulate the development of new antibiotics. Its findings, and other material were discussed at a conference in Stockholm in September 2009.The purpose of this paper is to contribute to the discussion that began in Stockholm by presenting policy makers and other relevant stakeholders with a short list of feasible and realistic solutions for Europe to stimulate R&D by attempting to determine the size of the various incentives needed to make the net present value (NPV) for antibiotic development more competitive relative to other therapeutic classes. To do this we selected incentives that have been implemented or discussed in regards to addressing disincentives and market failures in other markets: neglected diseases, orphan drugs, countermeasures against chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear (CBRN) agents, and evidence for paediatric drug use.
应对抗菌素耐药性的新药:欧盟政策选择分析
抗菌素耐药性(AMR)正在成为一个主要的全球公共卫生威胁,导致耐药性问题日益严重,这是用药物治疗传染病的自然结果。最近,AMR已经开始引起欧洲决策者的注意,他们的重点已经转向解决制药行业研发管道中缺乏新药的问题。2009年,欧盟将重点放在开发新抗生素的需求上,以填补管道,并需要引入适当的激励措施来刺激新抗生素的研发。伦敦经济学院(LSE)委托撰写的一份报告研究了刺激新抗生素开发的适当方法。2009年9月在斯德哥尔摩举行的一次会议上讨论了该研究的发现和其他材料。本文的目的是通过向政策制定者和其他相关利益相关者提供一份简短的可行和现实的解决方案清单,为欧洲刺激研发做出贡献,通过尝试确定各种激励措施的规模,使抗生素开发的净现值(NPV)相对于其他治疗类更具竞争力。为此,我们选择了在解决其他市场的抑制因素和市场失灵方面已经实施或讨论过的激励措施:被忽视的疾病、孤儿药、针对化学、生物、放射和核(CBRN)剂的对策以及儿科药物使用的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信