SLOBODA ŠTAMPE PREMA VIDOVDANSKOM USTAVU

Ružica Kijevčanin
{"title":"SLOBODA ŠTAMPE PREMA VIDOVDANSKOM USTAVU","authors":"Ružica Kijevčanin","doi":"10.46793/zbvu21.333k","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, the author starts from the thesis that freedom of expression, which is best reflected in freedom of the press, as the central public media of the time, was a clear indicator of the level of development of the newly created Yugoslav society. The press in the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes was a clear example of existing social antagonisms. Although the Vidovdan Constitution paid attention to this fundamental human freedom, classifying it as a political right of citizens, the manner of its regulation and practical application indicated limitations, immaturity and unwillingness of society to face its own weaknesses, ie the weaknesses of the ruling establishment, but also all important political factors. According to the letter of the constitution, freedom of the press is guaranteed, but with restrictions. These restrictions, such as the possibility of introducing censorship in cases provided by law, clearly raised the question of whether the existence of freedom of expression could be discussed at all in this period. The enjoyment of freedom of the press was concretized by a later law which found a foothold in the Constitution. Historical facts most faithfully reflect the situation in this area, but also the importance of the issue, through reflection on everyday political, cultural, educational, economic and social relations. After 100 years, the violation of freedom of the press is referred to as a violation of media freedom, which means that restrictions and violations of the rules have not been eradicated, but only shaped into new terminology, ie a new appearance.","PeriodicalId":348409,"journal":{"name":"Zbornik radova: \"100 GODINA OD VIDOVDANSKOG USTAVA\"","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zbornik radova: \"100 GODINA OD VIDOVDANSKOG USTAVA\"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46793/zbvu21.333k","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, the author starts from the thesis that freedom of expression, which is best reflected in freedom of the press, as the central public media of the time, was a clear indicator of the level of development of the newly created Yugoslav society. The press in the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes was a clear example of existing social antagonisms. Although the Vidovdan Constitution paid attention to this fundamental human freedom, classifying it as a political right of citizens, the manner of its regulation and practical application indicated limitations, immaturity and unwillingness of society to face its own weaknesses, ie the weaknesses of the ruling establishment, but also all important political factors. According to the letter of the constitution, freedom of the press is guaranteed, but with restrictions. These restrictions, such as the possibility of introducing censorship in cases provided by law, clearly raised the question of whether the existence of freedom of expression could be discussed at all in this period. The enjoyment of freedom of the press was concretized by a later law which found a foothold in the Constitution. Historical facts most faithfully reflect the situation in this area, but also the importance of the issue, through reflection on everyday political, cultural, educational, economic and social relations. After 100 years, the violation of freedom of the press is referred to as a violation of media freedom, which means that restrictions and violations of the rules have not been eradicated, but only shaped into new terminology, ie a new appearance.
在本文中,作者从这样一个论点出发:作为当时的中心公共媒体,言论自由最能体现在新闻自由上,它是新成立的南斯拉夫社会发展水平的一个清晰指标。塞尔维亚人、克罗地亚人和斯洛文尼亚人王国的新闻界是现存社会对立的一个明显例子。尽管《维多夫丹宪法》重视这一人类的基本自由,将其归类为公民的一项政治权利,但其规定和实际应用的方式显示出社会的局限性、不成熟和不愿意面对自身的弱点,即统治集团的弱点,以及所有重要的政治因素。根据宪法条文,新闻自由得到保障,但也有限制。这些限制,例如在法律规定的情况下实行审查制度的可能性,显然提出了一个问题,即在这一时期是否可以讨论言论自由的存在。出版自由的享受在后来的一部法律中得到具体化,这部法律在宪法中找到了立足点。通过对日常政治、文化、教育、经济和社会关系的反思,历史事实最忠实地反映了这一地区的情况,也反映了这一问题的重要性。100年后,对新闻自由的侵犯被称为对媒体自由的侵犯,这意味着限制和违反规则的行为并没有被根除,只是形成了新的术语,即新的面貌。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信