The Next 'Big Short': COVID-19, Student Loan Discharge in Bankruptcy, and the SLABS Market

Samantha Roy, Cj Ryan
{"title":"The Next 'Big Short': COVID-19, Student Loan Discharge in Bankruptcy, and the SLABS Market","authors":"Samantha Roy, Cj Ryan","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3631953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Even before the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic, student loan debt—totaling over $1.64 trillion—was a cause for concern, as it is the second largest source of consumer debt in the United States, trailing only mortgage debt. Like mortgage-backed securities, student loan asset-backed securities, or “SLABS,” are the securitized form of student loan debt, repackaged as a marketable financial instrument. Also like mortgage-backed securities, SLABS are backed by income streams generated by loans to individuals. As with any investment vehicle, asset-backed securities like SLABS come with risk, particularly when borrowers default on their loans or have their debt discharged through bankruptcy proceedings. However, historically, SLABS have been a relatively sure bet—yielding consistent returns on investment—given that student loans are guaranteed by the government and that student loan debt obligations are difficult for borrowers to escape. This is because there has been a long-standing prohibition on student loan discharge via bankruptcy proceedings. A recent decision rendered by the Chief Judge in the United States Bankruptcy Court in the Southern District of New York could eliminate that prohibition. In turn, this decision could negatively impact the SLABS market, and in a broad sense, the United States economy. \n \nThis Article addresses this possibility, especially in light of the fact that rising unemployment in the wake of the COVID-19 crisis is sure to increase the rate of default on student loans. Part I of this Article describes the present student loan crisis in terms of available statistics and common student loan repayment programs. Next, Part II chronicles the development of and operation of bankruptcy law doctrine in the context of student loans. Further, the second part of this Article explains the general prohibition against discharge of student loans in bankruptcy proceedings via the Brunner Test. Part III focuses on student loan asset-backed securities: what they are, how they operate, and how they generate profit. This final section will draw the connection between student loan discharge via bankruptcy and its potential impacts on the SLABS market and the economy at large. This Article concludes with observations about how the current crisis levels of student loan debt, when combined with rising unemployment and recent bankruptcy court decisions could impact the stability of the SLABS market and the broader economy.","PeriodicalId":188711,"journal":{"name":"EduRN: Educational Policy (Topic)","volume":"313 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EduRN: Educational Policy (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3631953","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Even before the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic, student loan debt—totaling over $1.64 trillion—was a cause for concern, as it is the second largest source of consumer debt in the United States, trailing only mortgage debt. Like mortgage-backed securities, student loan asset-backed securities, or “SLABS,” are the securitized form of student loan debt, repackaged as a marketable financial instrument. Also like mortgage-backed securities, SLABS are backed by income streams generated by loans to individuals. As with any investment vehicle, asset-backed securities like SLABS come with risk, particularly when borrowers default on their loans or have their debt discharged through bankruptcy proceedings. However, historically, SLABS have been a relatively sure bet—yielding consistent returns on investment—given that student loans are guaranteed by the government and that student loan debt obligations are difficult for borrowers to escape. This is because there has been a long-standing prohibition on student loan discharge via bankruptcy proceedings. A recent decision rendered by the Chief Judge in the United States Bankruptcy Court in the Southern District of New York could eliminate that prohibition. In turn, this decision could negatively impact the SLABS market, and in a broad sense, the United States economy. This Article addresses this possibility, especially in light of the fact that rising unemployment in the wake of the COVID-19 crisis is sure to increase the rate of default on student loans. Part I of this Article describes the present student loan crisis in terms of available statistics and common student loan repayment programs. Next, Part II chronicles the development of and operation of bankruptcy law doctrine in the context of student loans. Further, the second part of this Article explains the general prohibition against discharge of student loans in bankruptcy proceedings via the Brunner Test. Part III focuses on student loan asset-backed securities: what they are, how they operate, and how they generate profit. This final section will draw the connection between student loan discharge via bankruptcy and its potential impacts on the SLABS market and the economy at large. This Article concludes with observations about how the current crisis levels of student loan debt, when combined with rising unemployment and recent bankruptcy court decisions could impact the stability of the SLABS market and the broader economy.
下一个“大空头”:COVID-19、破产学生贷款清偿和平板市场
甚至在COVID-19大流行蔓延之前,学生贷款债务总额超过1.64万亿美元就引起了人们的担忧,因为它是美国消费者债务的第二大来源,仅次于抵押贷款债务。与抵押贷款支持证券一样,学生贷款资产支持证券(简称“slab”)是学生贷款债务的证券化形式,被重新包装为可销售的金融工具。与抵押贷款支持证券一样,slab由个人贷款产生的收入流提供支持。与任何投资工具一样,像slab这样的资产支持证券也存在风险,特别是当借款人拖欠贷款或通过破产程序解除债务时。然而,从历史上看,鉴于学生贷款是由政府担保的,而且借款人很难逃避学生贷款债务义务,slab一直是一种相对可靠的投资回报。这是因为长期以来一直禁止通过破产程序偿还学生贷款。纽约南区美国破产法院首席法官最近作出的一项裁决可能会取消这一禁令。反过来,这一决定可能会对slab市场产生负面影响,从广义上讲,也会对美国经济产生负面影响。本文讨论了这种可能性,特别是考虑到新冠肺炎危机后失业率上升肯定会增加学生贷款违约率。本文的第一部分从现有的统计数据和常见的学生贷款偿还计划方面描述了当前的学生贷款危机。其次,第二部分记录了破产法理论在学生贷款背景下的发展和运作。此外,本文第二部分通过布鲁纳测试解释了一般禁止在破产程序中免除学生贷款。第三部分着重于学生贷款资产支持证券:它们是什么,它们如何运作,以及它们如何产生利润。这最后一节将绘制学生贷款通过破产和其对平板市场和整个经济的潜在影响之间的联系。本文总结了当前学生贷款债务的危机水平,以及失业率上升和最近破产法院的判决如何影响slab市场和更广泛经济的稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信