Executable Exams: Taxonomy, Implementation and Prospects

Chris Bourke, Yael Erez, O. Hazzan
{"title":"Executable Exams: Taxonomy, Implementation and Prospects","authors":"Chris Bourke, Yael Erez, O. Hazzan","doi":"10.1145/3545945.3569724","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Traditionally exams in introductory programming courses have tended to be multiple choice, or \"paper-based\" coding exams in which students hand write code. This does not reflect how students typically write and are assessed on programming assignments in which they write code on a computer and are able to validate and assess their code using an auto-grading system. Executable exams are exams in which students are given programming problems, write code using a computer within a development environment and submissions are digitally validated or executed. This format is far more consistent with how students engage in programming assignments. This paper explores the executable exam format and attempts to gauge the state-of-the-practice and how prevalent it is. First, we formulate a taxonomy of characteristics of executable exams, identifying common aspects and various levels of flexibility. then give two case studies: one in which executable exams have been utilized for nearly 10 years and another in which they've been recently adopted. Finally, we provide results from faculty surveys providing evidence that, though not standard practice, the use of executable exams is not uncommon and appears to be on the rise.","PeriodicalId":371326,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3545945.3569724","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Traditionally exams in introductory programming courses have tended to be multiple choice, or "paper-based" coding exams in which students hand write code. This does not reflect how students typically write and are assessed on programming assignments in which they write code on a computer and are able to validate and assess their code using an auto-grading system. Executable exams are exams in which students are given programming problems, write code using a computer within a development environment and submissions are digitally validated or executed. This format is far more consistent with how students engage in programming assignments. This paper explores the executable exam format and attempts to gauge the state-of-the-practice and how prevalent it is. First, we formulate a taxonomy of characteristics of executable exams, identifying common aspects and various levels of flexibility. then give two case studies: one in which executable exams have been utilized for nearly 10 years and another in which they've been recently adopted. Finally, we provide results from faculty surveys providing evidence that, though not standard practice, the use of executable exams is not uncommon and appears to be on the rise.
可执行考试:分类、实现和展望
传统上,编程入门课程的考试往往是多项选择题,或者是要求学生手写代码的“纸本”编码考试。这并不能反映学生通常如何编写和评估他们在计算机上编写代码的编程作业,并且能够使用自动评分系统验证和评估他们的代码。可执行性考试是指学生在开发环境中使用计算机编写编程问题,并通过数字验证或执行提交的代码的考试。这种形式与学生从事编程作业的方式更加一致。本文探讨了可执行考试格式,并试图衡量实践的现状及其流行程度。首先,我们制定了可执行考试的特征分类,确定了共同的方面和不同级别的灵活性。然后给出两个案例研究:一个案例中可执行考试已经使用了近10年,另一个案例中它们最近才被采用。最后,我们提供了教师调查的结果,提供了证据,尽管不是标准实践,但可执行考试的使用并不罕见,而且似乎正在上升。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信