An Assessment of the Restructuring Debate in Nigerian Politics and its Models as a Pathway for Utilitarian Resource Management in Nigeria

Michael Ikechukwu Ineh- Dumbi
{"title":"An Assessment of the Restructuring Debate in Nigerian Politics and its Models as a Pathway for Utilitarian Resource Management in Nigeria","authors":"Michael Ikechukwu Ineh- Dumbi","doi":"10.24940/theijhss/2021/v9/i10/hs2110-046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"between2011 and 2014, 3% of Nigeria’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) was transferred abroad through illicit capital outflow, by 2011 the net value of abandoned projectsin Nigeria wasover 12 trillion Naira. Further crippling Nigeria resource management situation is an ageing civil service and bureaucratic bottleneck at the central government which controls over 800 agencies, (Eme, Ugwu& Sam 2011 and Omofaye, 2017).Such sums the chants by political observers and analysts that the current federal structure Abstract: Restructuring has been the mainstay chorus in Nigerian politics since the emergence of the Fourth Republic in 1999. The volumes of its advocate's chants keep growing louder and louder with the coming of each new federal executive administration. It has become a screeching sound with the emergence of Buhari’s federal administration, yet this administration differs in the modality for it with its critics. Also, central to the restructuring fever in the country is the issue of resource control, which can be contexted in the language of political engagement to mean who gets what, when and how. Also, tagging along with the centrality to the resource control theme are the tripod sub-themes of resource allocation, management and utilization structures that translate national assets deployed into prudent public good delivery. Likewise, it's of note that the Nigerian political environment serves as the platform for such transactions, as the trending climate in it determines the utilitarian deployment of resources in the nation. Yet, that climate can be characterized by structural imbalances in our mode of federalism, which results from an uncanny and unsuitable mix of paper federalism, uneven revenue contribution and sharing formula, as well as disproportional control of resources amongst federating units in Nigeria. Such a structure produces an output of underutilized and wasteful expenditure of national resources. Hence, this paper took on the task of assessing the restructuring debate and its mainstay models to sieve a pathway for utilitarian resource management in Nigeria. In doing this, it zoned in on three core areas of the Nigerian structure, extrapolated four models of the restructuring debate championed by political interests, compared our federal structure with those from other polity and recommended a model for consideration. From such activities, the findings showed that the restructuring debate is nuanced with several opinion directions absent of a consciously mapped plan for implementation, yet such does not translate its agenda to irrelevance. Also, it noted that the structural rigidity of the Nigerian federation is abysmal to utilitarian resource management in Nigeria and thus the need for its recalibrated. This paper undertook as it guiding research tools, a qualitative approach staffed with literature review, observation method, comparative and descriptive analysis to arrive at its conclusion.","PeriodicalId":443596,"journal":{"name":"The International Journal of Humanities & Social Studies","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Journal of Humanities & Social Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24940/theijhss/2021/v9/i10/hs2110-046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

between2011 and 2014, 3% of Nigeria’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) was transferred abroad through illicit capital outflow, by 2011 the net value of abandoned projectsin Nigeria wasover 12 trillion Naira. Further crippling Nigeria resource management situation is an ageing civil service and bureaucratic bottleneck at the central government which controls over 800 agencies, (Eme, Ugwu& Sam 2011 and Omofaye, 2017).Such sums the chants by political observers and analysts that the current federal structure Abstract: Restructuring has been the mainstay chorus in Nigerian politics since the emergence of the Fourth Republic in 1999. The volumes of its advocate's chants keep growing louder and louder with the coming of each new federal executive administration. It has become a screeching sound with the emergence of Buhari’s federal administration, yet this administration differs in the modality for it with its critics. Also, central to the restructuring fever in the country is the issue of resource control, which can be contexted in the language of political engagement to mean who gets what, when and how. Also, tagging along with the centrality to the resource control theme are the tripod sub-themes of resource allocation, management and utilization structures that translate national assets deployed into prudent public good delivery. Likewise, it's of note that the Nigerian political environment serves as the platform for such transactions, as the trending climate in it determines the utilitarian deployment of resources in the nation. Yet, that climate can be characterized by structural imbalances in our mode of federalism, which results from an uncanny and unsuitable mix of paper federalism, uneven revenue contribution and sharing formula, as well as disproportional control of resources amongst federating units in Nigeria. Such a structure produces an output of underutilized and wasteful expenditure of national resources. Hence, this paper took on the task of assessing the restructuring debate and its mainstay models to sieve a pathway for utilitarian resource management in Nigeria. In doing this, it zoned in on three core areas of the Nigerian structure, extrapolated four models of the restructuring debate championed by political interests, compared our federal structure with those from other polity and recommended a model for consideration. From such activities, the findings showed that the restructuring debate is nuanced with several opinion directions absent of a consciously mapped plan for implementation, yet such does not translate its agenda to irrelevance. Also, it noted that the structural rigidity of the Nigerian federation is abysmal to utilitarian resource management in Nigeria and thus the need for its recalibrated. This paper undertook as it guiding research tools, a qualitative approach staffed with literature review, observation method, comparative and descriptive analysis to arrive at its conclusion.
尼日利亚政治结构调整之争及其模式对尼日利亚功利资源管理之路径的评价
2011年至2014年间,尼日利亚国内生产总值(GDP)的3%通过非法资本外流转移到国外,到2011年,尼日利亚废弃项目的净值超过12万亿奈拉。进一步削弱尼日利亚资源管理状况的是控制800多个机构的中央政府的老龄化公务员和官僚主义瓶颈(Eme, ugwu&sam 2011和Omofaye, 2017)。摘要:自1999年第四共和国成立以来,重组一直是尼日利亚政治的主流合唱。随着每一届新的联邦行政当局的到来,其支持者的呼声越来越高。随着布哈里联邦政府的出现,它已经成为一种尖锐的声音,但这届政府的方式与批评者不同。此外,该国重组热潮的核心是资源控制问题,这可以用政治参与的语言来表达,即谁得到什么、何时得到以及如何得到。此外,与资源控制主题的中心地位密切相关的是资源分配、管理和利用结构的三脚架分主题,这些分主题将国家资产的部署转化为审慎的公共产品交付。同样,值得注意的是,尼日利亚的政治环境为此类交易提供了平台,因为其中的趋势气候决定了该国资源的功利主义部署。然而,这种气候的特点是我们联邦制模式的结构不平衡,这是由于纸面联邦制,不平衡的收入贡献和分享公式,以及尼日利亚联邦单位之间不成比例的资源控制的不可思议和不适当的混合造成的。这种结构造成的结果是国家资源未得到充分利用和浪费。因此,本文承担了评估重组辩论及其主要模式的任务,以筛选尼日利亚功利主义资源管理的途径。在此过程中,它对尼日利亚结构的三个核心领域进行了划分,推断了政治利益所倡导的重组辩论的四种模式,将我们的联邦结构与其他政体的结构进行了比较,并推荐了一种可供考虑的模式。从这些活动中,调查结果表明,改组辩论与缺乏有意识地制定执行计划的若干意见方向有细微差别,但这并没有使其议程变得无关紧要。它还指出,尼日利亚联邦的结构僵化对尼日利亚的实用资源管理极为不利,因此需要对其进行重新调整。本文采用文献法、观察法、比较分析法和描述分析法等定性研究方法作为指导研究工具,得出结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信