PENINGKATAN PRODUKSI DENGAN CARA MENDESAIN ULANG PROGRESSIVE CAVITY PUMP (PCP) PADA SUMUR “E” LAPANGAN “P”

Eko Prastio, Abdullah Rizky Agusman
{"title":"PENINGKATAN PRODUKSI DENGAN CARA MENDESAIN ULANG PROGRESSIVE CAVITY PUMP (PCP) PADA SUMUR “E” LAPANGAN “P”","authors":"Eko Prastio, Abdullah Rizky Agusman","doi":"10.25105/petro.v10i3.9417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Artificial lift method in an oil well is a production engineering that use the help of surface and downhole equipment in order to achieve optimum production when the well is not suited to use natural flow as the main lifting system. But in many cases, even after artificial lift method have using, the optimum production have not achieved yet, thus resulting a redesign of the existing artificial lift is needed. This problem exists on E well that is owned by PT XYZ 1 Field Jambi using Progressive Cavity Pump (PCP) as artificial lift. From the early calculation, it is found that the current production of 17,16 bfpd has not reached the targetted production that is 48,57 bfpd. This shows a need for the existing PCP to be redesigned.            Before redesigning the artificial lift, the current value of Productivity Index (PI) is needed in order to make an Inflow Performance Relationship (IPR) curve that will shows whether the oil well still worth producing or not. According to the results of this research, the value of PI is 0,47 with the maximum production at 60,72 bfpd and optimum production 48,57 bfpd. Meanwhile, the current production is only 17,16 bfpd. After the redesigning completed using R & M Energy Systems calculation methods as the provider of the current PCP, it is found that the optimal for revolution per minute (RPM), horse power (HP), torque values and the drive head type are 101,5 RPM, 2,7 HP, 15 ft-lbs and there have to be a change in drive head type AA4. To get results optimal production.","PeriodicalId":435945,"journal":{"name":"PETRO:Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Perminyakan","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PETRO:Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Perminyakan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25105/petro.v10i3.9417","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Artificial lift method in an oil well is a production engineering that use the help of surface and downhole equipment in order to achieve optimum production when the well is not suited to use natural flow as the main lifting system. But in many cases, even after artificial lift method have using, the optimum production have not achieved yet, thus resulting a redesign of the existing artificial lift is needed. This problem exists on E well that is owned by PT XYZ 1 Field Jambi using Progressive Cavity Pump (PCP) as artificial lift. From the early calculation, it is found that the current production of 17,16 bfpd has not reached the targetted production that is 48,57 bfpd. This shows a need for the existing PCP to be redesigned.            Before redesigning the artificial lift, the current value of Productivity Index (PI) is needed in order to make an Inflow Performance Relationship (IPR) curve that will shows whether the oil well still worth producing or not. According to the results of this research, the value of PI is 0,47 with the maximum production at 60,72 bfpd and optimum production 48,57 bfpd. Meanwhile, the current production is only 17,16 bfpd. After the redesigning completed using R & M Energy Systems calculation methods as the provider of the current PCP, it is found that the optimal for revolution per minute (RPM), horse power (HP), torque values and the drive head type are 101,5 RPM, 2,7 HP, 15 ft-lbs and there have to be a change in drive head type AA4. To get results optimal production.
通过重新设计井上“E”为P
油井人工举升法是在油井不适合以自然流作为主要举升系统的情况下,利用地面和井下设备实现最优产量的一种生产工程。但在许多情况下,即使采用了人工举升方法,也没有达到最佳产量,因此需要对现有的人工举升进行重新设计。该问题存在于PT XYZ 1 Field Jambi公司使用螺杆泵(PCP)进行人工举升的E井。从前期的计算中发现,目前17,16 bfpd的产量没有达到48,57 bfpd的目标产量。这表明需要对现有的PCP进行重新设计。在重新设计人工举升之前,需要利用产能指数(PI)的当前值来绘制流入动态关系(IPR)曲线,该曲线将显示油井是否仍值得生产。根据本研究结果,PI值为0.47,最大产量为60,72 bfpd,最优产量为48,57 bfpd。与此同时,目前的产量只有1716桶/天。在重新设计完成后,使用r&m能源系统的计算方法作为当前PCP的提供商,发现每分钟转数(RPM),马力(HP),扭矩值和驱动头类型的最佳值为101,5 RPM, 2,7 HP, 15 ft-lbs,并且必须更改驱动头类型AA4。以获得最佳生产效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信