Keberadaan Dewan Pengawas Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Pasca Revisi UU KPK

Muhammad Syahrum
{"title":"Keberadaan Dewan Pengawas Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Pasca Revisi UU KPK","authors":"Muhammad Syahrum","doi":"10.19184/jkph.v2i1.27842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT: Post-Suharto era has encouraged Indonesia to give birth to various new institutions, including the existence of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK). Over time, various elements that support the improvement of the performance of the KPK are formed through new norms contained in laws and regulations, including the existence of the KPK Supervisory Board (Dewas KPK). This study aims to examine and analyze the duties, authorities, and urgency of the KPK Council; while at the same time examining the potential of the KPK Council as an 'inhibitory' factor in eradicating corruption. This legal research uses a conceptual approach and legislation based on primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The results of the study stated that although the existence of the KPK Council has the same duties as the judiciary, it actually encounters problems; because, the existing provisions give rise to inconsistencies regarding the position of the KPK Council. On the other hand, the urgency of the establishment of the KPK Council is one of the efforts to strengthen the supervision aspect of the KPK's performance in order to be able to avoid various risks of abuse of power. Furthermore, there are three factors that have the potential to become \"inhibitory\" factors in eradicating corruption after the existence of the KPK Council, including the obligation to wait for permits regarding the conduct of wiretapping, searches and confiscations; there is potential vulnerability to political intervention; the potential for slack in the performance of the KPK itself. \nKEYWORDS: Corruption Eradication Commission, Supervisory Board, Law Number 19 of 2019.","PeriodicalId":313528,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Kajian Pembaruan Hukum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Kajian Pembaruan Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19184/jkph.v2i1.27842","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Post-Suharto era has encouraged Indonesia to give birth to various new institutions, including the existence of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK). Over time, various elements that support the improvement of the performance of the KPK are formed through new norms contained in laws and regulations, including the existence of the KPK Supervisory Board (Dewas KPK). This study aims to examine and analyze the duties, authorities, and urgency of the KPK Council; while at the same time examining the potential of the KPK Council as an 'inhibitory' factor in eradicating corruption. This legal research uses a conceptual approach and legislation based on primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The results of the study stated that although the existence of the KPK Council has the same duties as the judiciary, it actually encounters problems; because, the existing provisions give rise to inconsistencies regarding the position of the KPK Council. On the other hand, the urgency of the establishment of the KPK Council is one of the efforts to strengthen the supervision aspect of the KPK's performance in order to be able to avoid various risks of abuse of power. Furthermore, there are three factors that have the potential to become "inhibitory" factors in eradicating corruption after the existence of the KPK Council, including the obligation to wait for permits regarding the conduct of wiretapping, searches and confiscations; there is potential vulnerability to political intervention; the potential for slack in the performance of the KPK itself. KEYWORDS: Corruption Eradication Commission, Supervisory Board, Law Number 19 of 2019.
朝鲜劳动党法案修订后,腐败根除委员会的存在
摘要:后苏哈托时代促使印尼诞生了各种新机构,其中包括肃贪委员会(KPK)。随着时间的推移,通过法律法规中包含的新规范,包括KPK监事会(Dewas KPK)的存在,形成了支持KPK绩效改进的各种要素。本研究旨在检视和分析肃贪会的职责、权力和紧迫性;同时,检讨肃贪委员会在根除贪污方面的“抑制”作用。本法律研究采用了基于一手法律资料和第二手法律资料的概念方法和立法。研究结果表明,虽然肃贪委员会的存在与司法机关具有同样的职责,但它实际上遇到了问题;因为现行的规定使肃贪委员会的立场不一致。另一方面,迫切需要成立肃贪委员会也是加强对肃贪委员会绩效监督的努力之一,以避免各种滥用权力的风险。此外,在肃贪委员会成立后,有三个因素有可能成为铲除腐败的“抑制”因素,包括在进行窃听、搜查和没收方面必须等待许可的义务;存在政治干预的潜在脆弱性;KPK本身表现懈怠的可能性。关键词:反腐委员会、监事会、2019年第19号法律。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信