Review of Lauer's Creditworthy: A History of Consumer Surveillance and Financial Identity in America

Sachil Singh
{"title":"Review of Lauer's Creditworthy: A History of Consumer Surveillance and Financial Identity in America","authors":"Sachil Singh","doi":"10.24908/SS.V16I1.8193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In September 2017, Equifax, a leading credit reporting agency, announced a security breach that may have jeopardized the personal information, including Social Security Numbers, of nearly half the American population. In the wake of the breach, the government’s Internal Revenue Service (IRS) awarded a nowsuspended $7.2 million contract, perhaps ironically, to Equifax to verify taxpayer identity. In Creditworthy, Josh Lauer offers many insights that help contextualize that headline: he provides a history of credit that puts the spotlight on the hitherto largely undocumented development of credit institutions to link 19th Century surveillance regimes to 21st Century financialization; he traces the development of how credit reporting agencies use capitalist surveillance as a tool that now gathers information about millions of consumers; he shows how the textualizing of bodies (such as with Social Security Numbers) for the purposes of social monitoring has commercial rather than state origins; and he shows how government agencies—including the Department of Justice, FBI, IRS, and police—have depended on consumer data from credit institutions since at least World War I.","PeriodicalId":234638,"journal":{"name":"surveillance and society","volume":"89 4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"surveillance and society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24908/SS.V16I1.8193","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In September 2017, Equifax, a leading credit reporting agency, announced a security breach that may have jeopardized the personal information, including Social Security Numbers, of nearly half the American population. In the wake of the breach, the government’s Internal Revenue Service (IRS) awarded a nowsuspended $7.2 million contract, perhaps ironically, to Equifax to verify taxpayer identity. In Creditworthy, Josh Lauer offers many insights that help contextualize that headline: he provides a history of credit that puts the spotlight on the hitherto largely undocumented development of credit institutions to link 19th Century surveillance regimes to 21st Century financialization; he traces the development of how credit reporting agencies use capitalist surveillance as a tool that now gathers information about millions of consumers; he shows how the textualizing of bodies (such as with Social Security Numbers) for the purposes of social monitoring has commercial rather than state origins; and he shows how government agencies—including the Department of Justice, FBI, IRS, and police—have depended on consumer data from credit institutions since at least World War I.
劳尔的《信誉:美国消费者监督与金融身份史》述评
2017年9月,领先的信用报告机构Equifax宣布了一项安全漏洞,可能已经危及包括社会安全号码在内的近一半美国人的个人信息。泄露事件发生后,美国国税局(IRS)授予Equifax一份现已暂停的720万美元合同,以核实纳税人身份,这可能具有讽刺意味。在《信用价值》一书中,乔希·劳尔提供了许多见解,有助于将这一标题置于背景之中:他提供了信贷历史,将焦点放在迄今为止基本上没有记录的信贷机构发展上,将19世纪的监管制度与21世纪的金融化联系起来;他追溯了信用报告机构如何将资本主义监控作为一种工具,收集数百万消费者信息的发展历程;他展示了出于社会监控目的而将身体(如社会安全号码)文本化的做法,其根源是商业的,而非国家的;他还展示了至少从第一次世界大战开始,包括司法部、联邦调查局、国税局和警察在内的政府机构是如何依赖信贷机构的消费者数据的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信