Stroke in women: Is it different?

Sydney Corbière, B. Tettenborn
{"title":"Stroke in women: Is it different?","authors":"Sydney Corbière, B. Tettenborn","doi":"10.1177/2514183X211014514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the last decades, there has been great progress in the field of stroke. With the introduction of acute therapies (intravenous thrombolysis and intra-arterial treatment), the outcome after stroke has improved significantly. Better prevention, improved acute therapy, and acute rehabilitation improved the morbidity and mortality rate after stroke. Gender differences in risk factors and epidemiology have been known for a long time, but lately attention to gender differences in stroke has increased. The aim of this mini-review is to demonstrate gender disparities in stroke with a focus on epidemiology, specific risk factors (gender-specific and unspecific), and outcomes. The influence of some risk factors for stroke is stronger in women (atrial fibrillation and hypertension) and there are risk factors exclusive to women such as pregnancy, pregnancy-associated hypertensive disorders, oral contraceptives, and hormonal replacement treatment. Data on the impact of other risk factors are inconsistent. The worse outcome after a stroke is mainly caused by demographic characteristics in women. Specific gender research is needed to better understand gender disparities in stroke to improve prevention strategies and treatment for women.","PeriodicalId":242430,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Neuroscience","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Translational Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2514183X211014514","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In the last decades, there has been great progress in the field of stroke. With the introduction of acute therapies (intravenous thrombolysis and intra-arterial treatment), the outcome after stroke has improved significantly. Better prevention, improved acute therapy, and acute rehabilitation improved the morbidity and mortality rate after stroke. Gender differences in risk factors and epidemiology have been known for a long time, but lately attention to gender differences in stroke has increased. The aim of this mini-review is to demonstrate gender disparities in stroke with a focus on epidemiology, specific risk factors (gender-specific and unspecific), and outcomes. The influence of some risk factors for stroke is stronger in women (atrial fibrillation and hypertension) and there are risk factors exclusive to women such as pregnancy, pregnancy-associated hypertensive disorders, oral contraceptives, and hormonal replacement treatment. Data on the impact of other risk factors are inconsistent. The worse outcome after a stroke is mainly caused by demographic characteristics in women. Specific gender research is needed to better understand gender disparities in stroke to improve prevention strategies and treatment for women.
女性中风:有不同吗?
在过去的几十年里,中风领域有了很大的进展。随着急性治疗(静脉溶栓和动脉内治疗)的引入,卒中后的预后显著改善。更好的预防、改进的急性治疗和急性康复改善了卒中后的发病率和死亡率。在危险因素和流行病学方面的性别差异早已为人所知,但最近对中风的性别差异的关注有所增加。这篇小型综述的目的是论证卒中的性别差异,重点关注流行病学、特定危险因素(性别特异性和非性别特异性)和结果。一些危险因素对女性中风的影响更大(房颤和高血压),还有一些女性独有的危险因素,如妊娠、妊娠相关高血压疾病、口服避孕药和激素替代治疗。关于其他风险因素影响的数据不一致。中风后较差的结果主要是由女性的人口统计学特征引起的。需要具体的性别研究来更好地了解卒中中的性别差异,以改进女性的预防策略和治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信