{"title":"Comparison of residual compression methods in motion compensated video","authors":"Weekiong Poh, D. Monro","doi":"10.1109/MMSP.2002.1203260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we compare the objective performance of several algorithms for coding motion compensated residuals, including the wavelet transform, matching pursuits and an improved embedded DCT-based coding method. A motion-compensated prediction-based approach with overlapped block matching compensation (OBMC) is used in all systems in the evaluation. The results show that matching pursuits outperforms transform-based methods by 0.1-1.0 dB in PSNR. The embedded DCT coder usually outperforms the wavelet-based SPIHT-AC in the examples considered, and SPIHT is usually better than JPEG 2000.","PeriodicalId":398813,"journal":{"name":"2002 IEEE Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing.","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2002 IEEE Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MMSP.2002.1203260","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
Abstract
In this paper, we compare the objective performance of several algorithms for coding motion compensated residuals, including the wavelet transform, matching pursuits and an improved embedded DCT-based coding method. A motion-compensated prediction-based approach with overlapped block matching compensation (OBMC) is used in all systems in the evaluation. The results show that matching pursuits outperforms transform-based methods by 0.1-1.0 dB in PSNR. The embedded DCT coder usually outperforms the wavelet-based SPIHT-AC in the examples considered, and SPIHT is usually better than JPEG 2000.