Comparison of residual compression methods in motion compensated video

Weekiong Poh, D. Monro
{"title":"Comparison of residual compression methods in motion compensated video","authors":"Weekiong Poh, D. Monro","doi":"10.1109/MMSP.2002.1203260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we compare the objective performance of several algorithms for coding motion compensated residuals, including the wavelet transform, matching pursuits and an improved embedded DCT-based coding method. A motion-compensated prediction-based approach with overlapped block matching compensation (OBMC) is used in all systems in the evaluation. The results show that matching pursuits outperforms transform-based methods by 0.1-1.0 dB in PSNR. The embedded DCT coder usually outperforms the wavelet-based SPIHT-AC in the examples considered, and SPIHT is usually better than JPEG 2000.","PeriodicalId":398813,"journal":{"name":"2002 IEEE Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing.","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2002 IEEE Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MMSP.2002.1203260","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

In this paper, we compare the objective performance of several algorithms for coding motion compensated residuals, including the wavelet transform, matching pursuits and an improved embedded DCT-based coding method. A motion-compensated prediction-based approach with overlapped block matching compensation (OBMC) is used in all systems in the evaluation. The results show that matching pursuits outperforms transform-based methods by 0.1-1.0 dB in PSNR. The embedded DCT coder usually outperforms the wavelet-based SPIHT-AC in the examples considered, and SPIHT is usually better than JPEG 2000.
运动补偿视频中残余压缩方法的比较
在本文中,我们比较了几种运动补偿残差编码算法的客观性能,包括小波变换、匹配追踪和改进的嵌入式dct编码方法。在评估中,所有系统都采用了基于运动补偿预测的重叠块匹配补偿(OBMC)方法。结果表明,匹配追踪比基于变换的方法的PSNR提高了0.1 ~ 1.0 dB。在考虑的示例中,嵌入式DCT编码器通常优于基于小波的SPIHT- ac,并且SPIHT通常优于JPEG 2000。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信