How Accessibility Is For Everyone – A Deaf User Perspective

Rui Pinheiro, J. Barroso, Tânia Rocha
{"title":"How Accessibility Is For Everyone – A Deaf User Perspective","authors":"Rui Pinheiro, J. Barroso, Tânia Rocha","doi":"10.1145/3439231.3440614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When something is written regarding the need of accessibility, the authors typically put the emphasis in how it is something valuable for the people with disabilities (PwD) that need that accessibility in the first place in order to become included in the society; others follow the more debatable via of the human rights or the strive for a more humanist and inclusive society, even if such accessibility provision ends being legally enforced. Any benefits to non-PwD are usually seen as secondary effects due to PwDs becoming more autonomous or needing less support once the accessibility occurs to some extent. This article drives in a different direction, exposing direct benefits to the non-PwD when the world is more accessible, even when no actual PwD is needing any accessibility. For that purpose, examples are presented with non-PwD being benefited rather than PwD due to accessibilities that were thought to serve only for the PwD.","PeriodicalId":210400,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Software Development and Technologies for Enhancing Accessibility and Fighting Info-exclusion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Software Development and Technologies for Enhancing Accessibility and Fighting Info-exclusion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3439231.3440614","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When something is written regarding the need of accessibility, the authors typically put the emphasis in how it is something valuable for the people with disabilities (PwD) that need that accessibility in the first place in order to become included in the society; others follow the more debatable via of the human rights or the strive for a more humanist and inclusive society, even if such accessibility provision ends being legally enforced. Any benefits to non-PwD are usually seen as secondary effects due to PwDs becoming more autonomous or needing less support once the accessibility occurs to some extent. This article drives in a different direction, exposing direct benefits to the non-PwD when the world is more accessible, even when no actual PwD is needing any accessibility. For that purpose, examples are presented with non-PwD being benefited rather than PwD due to accessibilities that were thought to serve only for the PwD.
如何为每个人提供可访问性-聋人用户的视角
当写一些关于无障碍需求的东西时,作者通常会强调它对残疾人(PwD)来说是有价值的,他们首先需要无障碍,以便融入社会;其他人则遵循更具争议性的人权或争取更人道主义和更包容的社会,即使这种无障碍条款最终被法律强制执行。对非残疾人士的任何好处通常被视为次要影响,因为一旦无障碍程度达到一定程度,残疾人士就会变得更加自主或需要更少的支持。本文从不同的方向出发,当世界变得更容易访问时,即使没有实际的PwD需要任何可访问性,也会向非PwD展示直接的好处。为了达到这个目的,我们列举了一些非残疾人士而非残疾人士受益的例子,因为人们认为这些无障碍设施只适用于残疾人士。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信