Classification of research efforts in requirements engineering

P. Zave
{"title":"Classification of research efforts in requirements engineering","authors":"P. Zave","doi":"10.1145/267580.267581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article proposes and justifies a trial classification scheme. An earlier version was used to organize the papers submitted to this symposium, and the scheme has been refined somewhat in response to inadequacies discovered during the process of selecting the program. The first issue to be tackled is the heterogeneity of the topics usually considered part of requirements engineering. They include: tasks that must be completed; problems that must be solved; solutions to problems; ways of contributing to knowledge; and types of system. There seems to be a need for several orthogonal dimensions of classification. While multiple dimensions certainly help us cope with the heterogeneity of concerns, there is a danger of making the classification scheme too complex to use. I have compromised by settling on two dimensions.","PeriodicalId":354711,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of 1995 IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering (RE'95)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"568","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of 1995 IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering (RE'95)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/267580.267581","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 568

Abstract

The article proposes and justifies a trial classification scheme. An earlier version was used to organize the papers submitted to this symposium, and the scheme has been refined somewhat in response to inadequacies discovered during the process of selecting the program. The first issue to be tackled is the heterogeneity of the topics usually considered part of requirements engineering. They include: tasks that must be completed; problems that must be solved; solutions to problems; ways of contributing to knowledge; and types of system. There seems to be a need for several orthogonal dimensions of classification. While multiple dimensions certainly help us cope with the heterogeneity of concerns, there is a danger of making the classification scheme too complex to use. I have compromised by settling on two dimensions.
需求工程中研究工作的分类
本文提出并论证了一种试验分类方案。一个早期的版本被用来组织提交给本次研讨会的论文,并且该方案已经有所改进,以回应在选择方案过程中发现的不足。要解决的第一个问题是通常被认为是需求工程一部分的主题的异构性。它们包括:必须完成的任务;必须解决的问题;解决问题的方法;贡献知识的方式;以及系统的类型。似乎需要几个正交的分类维度。虽然多维确实可以帮助我们处理关注点的异质性,但存在使分类方案过于复杂而无法使用的危险。我妥协了,选择了二维。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信