A Study for the Press's Criminal Report and Fair Criminal Procedure

Hyeokki Kim
{"title":"A Study for the Press's Criminal Report and Fair Criminal Procedure","authors":"Hyeokki Kim","doi":"10.34222/kdps.2022.14.3.175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The media reports on crime have a positive effect that are satisfying the right of the people to know, preventing damage in the same crime, and helping to investigate unsolved specific cases. On the other hand, that has a negative effect that it can undermine the principle of presumption of innocence, cause infringement of personality rights, and that it can infringe fair investigation and fair trial by strengthening the guilt in criminal justice procedures. There is a need to find ways to control negative effects while maintaining positive effects of media reports on crime. In the media reports on crimes, it is necessary to carefully select the cases to be disclosed in the public information guidelines set by the investigative agencies, and it is necessary to unify the public information regulations separately provided by the police and the prosecution. Furthermore, it is necessary to establish standards in public information regulation in the case after the prosecution. Also, the standards of public information should be strengthened to prevent indiscriminate exploration reports, speculative reports, and provocative crime reports due to competition among media organizations. For the investigation reports or speculative reports on suspicions that have not been confirmed, it is necessary to prepare regulations that can admits unintentional intentions in the defamation crime if the preliminary work is not done to guarantee the objectivity of the report, or to change the burden of proof in the civil illegal act liability. Furthermore, it is necessary to consider introducing obstruction of justice to minimize the impact of uncertain media reports on the fairness of criminal justice procedures.","PeriodicalId":384688,"journal":{"name":"The Korean Association of Criminal Procedure Law","volume":"319 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Korean Association of Criminal Procedure Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34222/kdps.2022.14.3.175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The media reports on crime have a positive effect that are satisfying the right of the people to know, preventing damage in the same crime, and helping to investigate unsolved specific cases. On the other hand, that has a negative effect that it can undermine the principle of presumption of innocence, cause infringement of personality rights, and that it can infringe fair investigation and fair trial by strengthening the guilt in criminal justice procedures. There is a need to find ways to control negative effects while maintaining positive effects of media reports on crime. In the media reports on crimes, it is necessary to carefully select the cases to be disclosed in the public information guidelines set by the investigative agencies, and it is necessary to unify the public information regulations separately provided by the police and the prosecution. Furthermore, it is necessary to establish standards in public information regulation in the case after the prosecution. Also, the standards of public information should be strengthened to prevent indiscriminate exploration reports, speculative reports, and provocative crime reports due to competition among media organizations. For the investigation reports or speculative reports on suspicions that have not been confirmed, it is necessary to prepare regulations that can admits unintentional intentions in the defamation crime if the preliminary work is not done to guarantee the objectivity of the report, or to change the burden of proof in the civil illegal act liability. Furthermore, it is necessary to consider introducing obstruction of justice to minimize the impact of uncertain media reports on the fairness of criminal justice procedures.
新闻刑事报道与刑事诉讼公正研究
媒体对犯罪的报道具有满足民众知情权、防止同一犯罪造成损害、帮助侦破具体悬案的积极作用。另一方面,它也有消极的影响,可能破坏无罪推定原则,造成人格权的侵犯,并可能通过加强刑事司法程序中的罪责而侵犯公正的侦查和公正的审判。有必要找到控制负面影响的方法,同时保持媒体报道对犯罪的积极影响。在媒体报道犯罪时,有必要在调查机关制定的公开信息指南中慎重选择公开的案件,并统一警方和检察机关分别制定的公开信息规定。此外,有必要在起诉后的案件中建立公共信息监管标准。另外,为了防止媒体之间的竞争,不加区分地进行探询报道、推测报道、挑衅性的犯罪报道,应加强新闻标准。对于尚未确认嫌疑的调查报告或推测性报告,有必要制定规定,在未做好准备工作的情况下,可以承认诽谤犯罪中的故意,或改变民事违法行为责任中的举证责任。此外,有必要考虑引入妨碍司法,以尽量减少不确定的媒体报道对刑事司法程序公正性的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信