Effectiveness of three manually operated weeding tools for farm women

N. Kumar, Md. Sajid Hussain, R. Kumar, R. K. Roy
{"title":"Effectiveness of three manually operated weeding tools for farm women","authors":"N. Kumar, Md. Sajid Hussain, R. Kumar, R. K. Roy","doi":"10.52151/aet2020444.1525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, khurpi, three tyne hoe and twin wheel hoe were evaluated in terms of performance, grade of work and comfort for gram crop with eight farm women (subjects). Weeding operation between the rows of gram crop was carried out with these tools during December-January, when the average ambient temperature and relative humidity were 18OC and 70%, respectively. The result of this investigation indicated that weeding with khurpi and twin wheel hoe could be graded as moderately heavy work, whereas weeding with 3-tyne hoe could be graded as heavy work. However, weeding with khurpi required less energy (9.39 kJ/min) than twin wheel hoe (9. 67 kJ/min). High energy expenditure (12.89 kJ/min) was observed in case of 3-tyne hoe. In terms of higher output, twin wheel hoe was observed best (179 man-h/ha) than 3-tyne hoe (302 man-h/ha) followed by khurpi (447 man-h/ha). Khurpi had shown highest weeding efficiency (92.1 to 94.8 %). Improved weeding tools such as twin wheel hoe and 3-tyne hoe reduced physical exertion and fatigue to make farm women comfortable.","PeriodicalId":216128,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Engineering Today","volume":"156 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Engineering Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52151/aet2020444.1525","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

In this study, khurpi, three tyne hoe and twin wheel hoe were evaluated in terms of performance, grade of work and comfort for gram crop with eight farm women (subjects). Weeding operation between the rows of gram crop was carried out with these tools during December-January, when the average ambient temperature and relative humidity were 18OC and 70%, respectively. The result of this investigation indicated that weeding with khurpi and twin wheel hoe could be graded as moderately heavy work, whereas weeding with 3-tyne hoe could be graded as heavy work. However, weeding with khurpi required less energy (9.39 kJ/min) than twin wheel hoe (9. 67 kJ/min). High energy expenditure (12.89 kJ/min) was observed in case of 3-tyne hoe. In terms of higher output, twin wheel hoe was observed best (179 man-h/ha) than 3-tyne hoe (302 man-h/ha) followed by khurpi (447 man-h/ha). Khurpi had shown highest weeding efficiency (92.1 to 94.8 %). Improved weeding tools such as twin wheel hoe and 3-tyne hoe reduced physical exertion and fatigue to make farm women comfortable.
三种农妇手动除草工具的有效性
本研究以8名农家妇女(被试)为研究对象,对khurpi、三轮锄和双轮锄的工作性能、工作等级和舒适度进行了评价。在12 - 1月平均环境温度为18℃,相对湿度为70%的条件下,利用该工具进行禾草行间除草作业。调查结果表明,双轮锄除草可归类为中繁重工作,三轮锄除草可归类为繁重工作。然而,与双轮锄相比,khurpi除草所需的能量更少(9.39 kJ/min)。67 kJ /分钟)。三轮锄的能量消耗较高(12.89 kJ/min)。在高产方面,双轮锄的产量最高(179人h/ha),三轮锄的产量最高(302人h/ha),其次是轮式锄(447人h/ha)。胡尔皮的除草效率最高(92.1% ~ 94.8%)。双轮锄、三轮锄等除草工具的改进,减少了体力消耗和疲劳,使农妇感到舒适。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信