Testing Reader Ethical Judgments over the Course of a Narrative

Gregory Lessard, M. Levison
{"title":"Testing Reader Ethical Judgments over the Course of a Narrative","authors":"Gregory Lessard, M. Levison","doi":"10.4230/OASIcs.CMN.2013.147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present a web-based environment - an Ethics Workbench - which \nallows a reader's ethical judgments to be solicited while reading a \nnarrative. Preliminary results show generally consistent scores across \nsubjects and test conditions, and suggest that it is possible to \nmeasure how individual readers respond to texts in terms of ethical \njudgments, how the linearity inherent in narrative plays a role in \naffecting ethical judgments, and how readers appear to synthesize \njudgments over the course of a text. Applications of the model include \nthe empirical analysis of the ethical aspects of reading, the more \ndetailed study of ethical issues, the potential for eliciting ethical \ndiscussions, and a means of dynamically planning texts to achieve \nmaximum effect with respect to reader judgments.","PeriodicalId":311534,"journal":{"name":"Workshop on Computational Models of Narrative","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Workshop on Computational Models of Narrative","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4230/OASIcs.CMN.2013.147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We present a web-based environment - an Ethics Workbench - which allows a reader's ethical judgments to be solicited while reading a narrative. Preliminary results show generally consistent scores across subjects and test conditions, and suggest that it is possible to measure how individual readers respond to texts in terms of ethical judgments, how the linearity inherent in narrative plays a role in affecting ethical judgments, and how readers appear to synthesize judgments over the course of a text. Applications of the model include the empirical analysis of the ethical aspects of reading, the more detailed study of ethical issues, the potential for eliciting ethical discussions, and a means of dynamically planning texts to achieve maximum effect with respect to reader judgments.
在叙述过程中测试读者的道德判断
我们提出了一个基于网络的环境——一个伦理工作台——它允许读者在阅读叙述时征求道德判断。初步结果显示,在不同科目和测试条件下,得分总体上是一致的,并表明有可能衡量个体读者对文本的道德判断的反应,叙事中固有的线性如何影响道德判断,以及读者在文本过程中如何综合判断。该模型的应用包括对阅读伦理方面的实证分析,对伦理问题的更详细的研究,引发伦理讨论的可能性,以及动态规划文本以达到读者判断的最大效果的手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信